Article
Follow-up study of individuals with high tetraplegia (c1-c4) 14 to 24 years postinjury,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90265-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine the life circumstances and psychosocial status of individuals with respirator-assisted and respirator-independent high tetraplegia an average of 19 years after spinal cord injury.

Design: Survey data were analyzed separately for ventilator-assisted and ventilator-independent groups.

Setting: Three spinal cord injury rehabilitation centers in California, Colorado, and Texas.

Subjects: Eighty-two individuals with C1-C4 tetraplegia between 14 and 24 years postinjury who had received acute inpatient rehabilitation.

Main Outcome Measures: Demographics, health care utilization patterns, activities of daily living (Katz Level of Free Time Activities Scale), self esteem (Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale), quality of life, and employment.

Results: Self esteem and quality of life were reported as high. Most subjects had some form of health care insurance. More than 90% lived in private homes. Approximately one third of cases had at least a college degree, yet only one quarter reported being employed. One fifth of individuals were married. Almost half of ventilator-independent cases and one quarter of ventilator-assisted cases lived in households with income of less than $20,000 per year. Mean hospital days in the past year were 11 for the ventilator-independent group and 6 for the ventilator-assisted group. The latter group required more nursing level care, significantly more hours of care, and more paid attendants over the year. Ninety-five percent of individuals reported being “glad to be alive.”

Conclusions: Assistance in the areas of socialization, financial status, personal assistance services, transportation, and entry into competitive employment were defined as needed. Quality of life was higher than expected, considering the substantial physical limitations of the group. The sample was almost unanimously glad to be alive, including all ventilator-assisted individuals.

References (25)

  • K Gerhart

    Quality of life: the danger of differing perceptions

    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil

    (1997)
  • K Gerhart et al.

    Quality of life following spinal-cord injury: knowledge and attitudes of emergency care providers

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, United States Department of Education, Washington, DC, grants H133N00002, H133N00012, and H133A20004.

    ☆☆

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text