Original article: general thoracic
Bronchoscopy simulator effectively prepares junior residents to competently perform basic clinical bronchoscopy

Presented at the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.058Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Teaching procedural skills in a clinical setting is becoming increasingly difficult. Simulators can provide safe and inexpensive skills training. This randomized study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a bronchoscopy simulator in teaching clinical bronchoscopy.

Methods

Three groups of surgical residents were evaluated while performing an intraoperative flexible bronchoscopy. First year (PGY1) residents were randomly assigned to perform bronchoscopy either with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) preprocedural bronchoscopic simulator training (PreOp flexible bronchoscopic simulator, Immersion Medical, Gaithersburg, MD). Residents PGY2 to 3 (n = 3) with prior bronchoscopic experience (≥ 10 bronchoscopies) underwent evaluation without simulator training. Subjects were required to complete a systematic airway examination through a laryngeal mask airway with patients under general anesthesia. Evaluation criteria included procedure time, number of verbal and physical interventions by evaluator, and a rating of exam thoroughness, proficiency, and confidence.

Results

The PGY1 subjects who trained on the simulator required significantly fewer verbal (6.2 ± 1.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.8) and physical (1.6 ± 0.2 vs 0.2 ± 0.4) cues and performed more systematic examinations (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.4 ± 0.9 on scale 1 to 5) than those who did not use the trainer. The skill level of PGY1 subjects who worked with the simulator was similar to that of PGY2 to 3 residents experienced in bronchoscopy. Procedural times were not different between groups as the evaluator maintained the pace of the examination using verbal and physical assistance.

Conclusions

One hour of training with the bronchoscopic simulator effectively taught residents basic bronchoscopy and familiarity with airway anatomy. Residents using the trainer performed first-time bronchoscopy nearly as competently as residents experienced with bronchoscopy.

Section snippets

Material and methods

First year general surgery and preliminary residents (PGY1) and second and third year (PGY2 and PGY3) general surgery residents rotating through the thoracic surgery service were eligible to enter the study. A total of thirteen residents, divided into three groups, participated: Naïve PGY1 residents with no bronchoscopy training (n = 5); trained PGY1 residents after bronchoscopy simulator training (n = 5); experienced PGY2 to 3 residents with previous bronchoscopic experience (n = 3).

All PGY 1

Results

Participants in the training group all completed the basic anatomy model and at least one patient simulation. The average number of patient simulations completed was 3.8. The amount of time spent with the simulator averaged 60 minutes.

The numbers of endoscopic and bronchoscopic procedures observed and performed were no different between the naïve and trained groups. (Table 1) The experienced group had all done ten or more bronchoscopies before evaluation.

Times to completion of bronchoscopy were

Comment

Bronchoscopy is a basic skill that all surgical residents should master early in training. Intraoperative bronchoscopy before thoracic procedures provides an ideal opportunity for residents to learn bronchoscopic techniques. We found that even one hour of work with the simulator dramatically improved the ability of junior residents to perform bronchoscopy. This allowed them to concentrate on relevant pathology and anatomy during their intraoperative bronchoscopy.

This study was only intended to

Acknowledgements

The simulator was purchased by funds donated to the NIMIST laboratory from the United States Surgical Corp.

References (4)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (147)

  • Climbing the Mountain: Value of Simulation in Interventional Radiology Training

    2019, Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text