Chest
Clinical InvestigationsSurgeryPreoperative Severity of Emphysema Predictive of Improvement After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery: Use of CT Morphometry
Section snippets
Patient Selection
The procedures used in this study were approved by theInstitutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh MedicalCenter. All of the patients signed informed consent forms that allowedthe use of physiologic data, CT scans, and the surgically resectedtissue. Patient selection criteria have been publishedelsewhere.3 CT was obtained on all patients and was usedto identify surgically accessible emphysematous lesions and to excludepatients with diffuse disease using standard visual assessment.
Patient Characteristics and Physiologic Response to LVRS
Patient characteristics and physiologic indexes before and afterLVRS for the total group of 35 patients (group T) are shown in Table 1. At 3 months after surgery, group T demonstrated statisticallysignificant improvement in FVC, FEV1, RV, TLC,and functional residual capacity (FRC), but no significant changes werefound in the Dlco.
In group E, physiologic variables responded similarly to group Tfollowing surgery. The characteristics and maximal cycle ergometrywatts before and after LVRS of the
Discussion
LVRS for end-stage emphysema was introduced > 40 yearsago.1 The physiologic basis for the surgery wassound,15 and while it was shown to improve airwayconductance postoperatively,16 this change wastransient17 and the mortality was high.2Several articles have rekindled interest in the procedure and reportimprovement in physiologic parameters such asFEV1, FVC, FRC, RV, TLC,41018 andlung elastic recoil,31920 as well as lower surgicaloperative mortality. Other fundamental physiologic changes
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to express our sincere thanks toLaurie Silfies, who coordinated the data analysis, ClaudeLavalleée who prepared the manuscript, William Slivka, whoconducted the physiologic testing, William Bradford Rogers, who helpedin many important ways to get this study completed, and a specialthanks to Dr. Carl Fuhrman, for his thoughtful suggestions.
References (33)
- et al.
“Density mask.” An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography
Chest
(1988) Early and long-term functional outcomes following lung volume reduction surgery
Clin Chest Med
(1997)- et al.
Lung reduction surgery in chronic obstructive lung disease
Med Clin North Am
(1996) - et al.
Contribution of lung and chest wall mechanics following emphysema resection
Chest
(1996) - et al.
Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema
Chest
(1999) - et al.
Neural drive to the diaphragm after lung volume reduction surgery
Chest
(1999) Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with advanced lung disease
Clin Chest Med
(1997)- et al.
Lung reduction surgery in severe COPD decreases central drive and ventilatory response to CO2
Chest
(1997) - et al.
Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema by computerised tomography
Lancet
(1984) - et al.
Weight gain after lung volume reduction surgery is not correlated with improvement in pulmonary mechanics
Chest
(1999)
Surgical treatment of pulmonary emphysema
Am Surg
The surgical approach to pulmonary emphysema
Dis Chest
Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung-reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema
N Engl J Med
Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin section CT densitometry
Radiology
Pulmonary emphysema: comparison of preoperative quantitative CT and physiologic index values with clinical outcome after lung-volume reduction surgery
Radiology
Cited by (81)
Treating tumors with minimally invasive therapy: A review
2020, Materials Science and Engineering CCitation Excerpt :In addition to tumor detection, some other methods, such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, play important roles in tumor treatment. Surgery, especially since the demonstration of anesthesia in 1846, plays an important role in removing tumors from the body in many cases, and it is still efficient in terms of time, especially when combined with chemotherapy and imaging technology, such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and ultrasound (US) [15–21]. However, surgery therapy may be associated with unbearable pain, esthetic deformities, severe complications and tumor recurrence [22–25].
Size-capacity mismatch in the lung: a novel predictor for complications after lung cancer surgery
2017, Journal of Surgical ResearchAssessment of volume reduction effect after lung lobectomy for cancer
2015, Journal of Surgical ResearchCT quantification of emphysema: Is semi-quantitative scoring a reliable enough method?
2014, Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineHeterogeneity of lung volume reduction surgery outcomes in patients selected by use of evidence-based criteria
2013, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryRecent findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by using quantitative computed tomography
2012, Respiratory InvestigationCitation Excerpt :This application of quantitative CT helps in selecting candidates for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and provides insights into the mechanisms of improvement after LVRS. In a subgroup of 21 patients with severe COPD who underwent LVRS, postoperative changes in FEV1 and maximal exercise capacity correlated with extent of preoperative emphysema of the whole lung [60,62,63] and the upper [62], and upper-rind regions of the lungs [60]. The volume reduction in regions with severe emphysema [63] or with confluent emphysema [62] has been cited as a mechanism of improvement after LVRS.
Supported by a grant from the George H. Love research fund.