Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Self-fill oxygen technology: benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment

Phyllis Murphie, Nick Hex, Jo Setters, Stuart Little
Breathe 2016 12: 113-119; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.013515
Phyllis Murphie
1Respiratory Medicine Dept, NHS Dumfries and Galloway, Dumfries, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: phyllis.murphie@nhs.net
Nick Hex
2York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Setters
2York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Little
1Respiratory Medicine Dept, NHS Dumfries and Galloway, Dumfries, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

“Non-delivery” home oxygen technologies that allow self-filling of ambulatory oxygen cylinders are emerging. They can offer a relatively unlimited supply of ambulatory oxygen in suitably assessed people who require long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), providing they can use these systems safely and effectively. This allows users to be self-sufficient and facilitates longer periods of time away from home. The evolution and evidence base of this technology is reported with the experience of a national service review in Scotland (UK). Given that domiciliary oxygen services represent a significant cost to healthcare providers globally, these systems offer potential cost savings, are appealing to remote and rural regions due to the avoidance of cylinder delivery and have additional lower environmental impact due to reduced fossil fuel consumption and subsequently reduced carbon emissions. Evidence is emerging that self-fill/non-delivery oxygen systems can meet the ambulatory oxygen needs of many patients using LTOT and can have a positive impact on quality of life, increase time spent away from home and offer significant financial savings to healthcare providers.

Educational aims

  • Provide update for oxygen prescribers on options for home oxygen provision.

  • Provide update on the evidence base for available self-fill oxygen technologies.

  • Provide and update for healthcare commissioners on the potential cost-effective and environmental benefits of increased utilisation of self-fill oxygen systems.

Abstract

Healthcare providers should include self-fill oxygen systems as a therapeutic options in those meeting LTOT criteria http://ow.ly/YW2Gv

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at breathe.ersjournals.com

  • ©ERS 2016

Breathe articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 12 Issue 2 Table of Contents
Breathe: 12 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Self-fill oxygen technology: benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Self-fill oxygen technology: benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment
Phyllis Murphie, Nick Hex, Jo Setters, Stuart Little
Breathe Jun 2016, 12 (2) 113-119; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.013515

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Self-fill oxygen technology: benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment
Phyllis Murphie, Nick Hex, Jo Setters, Stuart Little
Breathe Jun 2016, 12 (2) 113-119; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.013515
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Oxygen self-fill technology
    • What is the evidence for self-fill oxygen systems?
    • The NHS Scotland experience: national home oxygen project
    • Potential for reduction in carbon emissions with the self-fill system
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics
  • COPD and smoking
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of asthma during conception, pregnancy and delivery
  • Non-traumatic chylothorax: diagnostic and therapeutic strategies
  • Industry influence in healthcare harms patients: myth or maxim?
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About Breathe

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Intructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 1810-6838
Online ISSN: 2073-4735

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society