Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer

Clementine Bostantzoglou, Marianthi Iliopoulou, Georgia Hardavella
Breathe 2018 14: 342-344; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.027118
Clementine Bostantzoglou
1Intensive Care Unit, Korgialeneion-Benakeion General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: clementinebost@hotmail.com
Marianthi Iliopoulou
27th Respiratory Medicine Dept, “Sotiria” Athens Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgia Hardavella
310th Respiratory Medicine Dept, “Sotiria” Athens Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

VAM(LA) has adequate sensitivity to be considered as the approach of choice for preoperative mediastinal staging in the subgroup of early-stage operable NSCLC patients http://ow.ly/42Wn30m78Zw

Commentary on:

Decaluwé H, et al. Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective multicentre study. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701493.

Lung cancer is the number one cause of death due to cancer worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, it accounted for 1.69 million new cases in 2015, whereas in Europe, 20.8% of all deaths due to cancer (>266 000 cases) were attributable to lung cancer in 2011 [1, 2].

Accurate lung cancer staging is fundamental to plan optimum individualised therapy. Extensive mediastinal staging is recommended before surgical resection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and clinical/radiological stage I or II disease [3]. Previous guidelines published by European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommend that endosonography should be performed over surgical staging as the initial procedure for mediastinal nodal staging in patients with suspected or proven NSCLC and abnormal mediastinal and/or hilar nodes at computed tomography (CT) and/or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, (recommendation grade A) [4]. However, recent studies report relatively low sensitivity for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) to detect mediastinal disease in clinical N0 PET-CT, while others report a significant risk of mediastinal nodal involvement in patients classified as clinical N1 by PET-CT [5–10].

This article reports the findings of a prospective clinical trial by Decaluwé et al. [11]. Investigators attempted to evaluate preoperatively the sensitivity of video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) or VAM–lymphadenectomy (VAM(LA)) in mediastinal staging of operable and resectable suspected NSCLC and clinical N1 disease (cN1).

Conventional mediastinoscopy has been considered the gold-standard method for preoperative mediastinal staging in NSCLC patients. Its sensitivity depends on the number of lymph nodes and the amount of lymph node tissue resected; this results in false-negative rates that have been reported to be as high as 10% [12]. VAM(LA) is a minimally invasive technique of systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. Optic fibres are integrated to conventional mediastinoscopes, and further modifications are made in the mediastinoscope's working channel allowing bimanual surgery, optimum visualisation and access to lymph nodes. The technique was developed in an attempt to achieve maximum accuracy and radical lymph node excision in a minimally invasive manner, thus reducing the high false-positive rates of conventional mediastinoscopy. In VAM, lymph nodes of different stations are assessed and sampled, but not necessarily removed completely, as during VAM(LA) [13, 14].

Patients, methods, study design and end-points

For this prospective non-randomised multicentre clinical trial, inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, operable suspected NSCLC and cN1 disease based on FDG-PET-CT. cN1 disease was defined as enlarged lymph nodes (≥10 mm on the largest short axis on CT) or a FDG-PET-positive lymph node in an N1 position, as described in the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lymph node map [15]. FDG-PET-CT lymph node positivity was defined as FDG uptake higher than background uptake in the mediastinal blood pool. Conversely, patients with unresectable neoplasia, known medical history of cancer with previous treatment, cT3 or cT4 disease based on TNM classification or previous endobronchial ultrasound of mediastinal lymph nodes were excluded from the study.

Sensitivity in detecting mediastinal nodal involvement (N2 disease) by VAM(LA) was the primary end-point. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of patients with positive mediastinal staging by VAM(LA) out of all patients with mediastinal nodal disease. Secondary endpoints were negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, negative post-test probability and assessment of the prevalence of N2/3 disease.

Results

105 patients were enrolled and VAM(LA) was positive in 20 of these: 13 with single-level N2 disease, four with multilevel N2 and three with N3 disease. The median number of biopsied lymph node stations was four. The most frequently biopsied node stations were 4R, 7 and 4L: 98% (103 patients), 95% (100 patients) and 91% (96 patients), respectively. Adverse events related to VAM were reported in four (4%) patients: one case of bleeding, one case of uncomplicated wound infection and two cases of transient recurrent nerve paralysis.

Out of the 83 who ultimately underwent surgery, having no N2/N3 disease during preoperative VAM(LA), seven were found to have positive mediastinal lymph node disease at resection; two of them had multilevel N2 disease and five had single-level N2 disease.

The prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases was 0.26 (95% CI 0.18–0.35) overall, sensitivity of VAM(LA) was 0.73 (95% CI 0.54–0.86), its accuracy was 0.93 (95% CI 0.86–0.97), NPV was 0.92 (95% CI 0.83–0.97) and negative post-test probability was 0.08 (95% CI 0.03–0.17).

Discussion

The main findings of this prospective study on mediastinal staging in patients with cN1 disease were that approximately a quarter of patients with cN1 lung cancer proved to have N2 disease and that sensitivity of VAM(LA) to detect positive mediastinal nodes in these patients was 73%.

As mentioned, accurate staging is a key part of treatment planning for lung cancer patients and mediastinal staging is currently recommended before surgical resection of early-stage NSCLC. However, current guidelines leave open the choice between endosonographic and surgical preoperative mediastinal staging. This is the main question investigators of this study attempted to answer.

Endosonography's (EBUS-TBNA) sensitivity to detect nodal disease in the setting of operable cN1 NSCLC has been evaluated in previous studies and has been found to be moderate, with values ranging from 0.38 to 0.53 [9, 16, 17]. In a recent paper on lung cancer staging in the European Respiratory Journal, Rami-Porta et al. [10] suggest that in early-stage, operable NSCLC, EBUS-TBNA should not be of routine use and that mediastinoscopy may be the preferred method to preoperative mediastinal staging.

In this study by Decaluwé et al. [11], VAM(LA)'s sensitivity was estimated to be 73%, thus providing further evidence to support that this may represent the examination of choice for the pre-resection mediastinal nodal-staging.

The study's limitations include a smaller amount of enrolled patients (105 instead of the initial goal of 205) possibly because of increasing numbers of referrals for endosonography staging, which was an exclusion criterion. The smaller number of patients resulted in increased range of the 95% confidence intervals for the diagnostic indices. The investigators also stress that only in 31% (n=33) of patients, the mediastinoscopy was VAM(LA) and that in four patients, the false-negative station that was partially sampled during VAM would have been positive if the station had been removed completely. Moreover, the study was performed by institutions with well-established thoracic surgery departments that were willing to participate in a prospective study on surgical staging. Therefore, the results may be different than in daily clinical practice in institutions where endosonography is embedded in the diagnostic referral process and that may lack well established thoracic surgery departments. VAM(LA) in particular, a surgical procedure that performed excellently in this study, is only performed in certain thoracic centres with relevant expertise.

In conclusion, this study provides evidence that VAM(LA) has adequate sensitivity to be considered as the approach of choice for preoperative mediastinal staging in the subgroup of early-stage operable NSCLC patients. However, it is a special technique, performed only in tertiary thoracic surgery centres; therefore, future studies are needed to establish it widely in daily clinical practice.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: C. Bostantzoglou has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Iliopoulou has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: G. Hardavella has nothing to disclose.

  • Copyright ©ERS 2018

Breathe articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Cancer. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer Date last accessed: August, 2018.
  2. ↵
    1. Eurostat Press Office
    . 1 in 4 deaths caused by cancer in the EU28. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/6131615/3-25112014-BP-EN/aab2c2d3-aed9-430a-a561-e188b8ef49d8 Date last updated: November 2014. Date last accessed: August, 2018.
  3. ↵
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network
    . Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Version 6.2018). www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf Date last accessed: August 20, 2018.
  4. ↵
    1. Vilmann P,
    2. Frost Clementsen P,
    3. Colella S, et al.
    Combined endobronchial and esophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48: 1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shingyoji M,
    2. Nakajima T,
    3. Yoshino M, et al.
    Endobronchial ultrasonography for positron emission tomography and computed tomography-negative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98: 1762–1767.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ong P,
    2. Grosu H,
    3. Eapen GA, et al.
    Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for systematic nodal staging of lung cancer in patients with N0 disease by computed tomography and integrated positron emission tomography computed tomography. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 415–419.
    OpenUrl
    1. Vial M,
    2. O'Connell O,
    3. Grosu H, et al.
    Diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal lymph node sampling in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective study. Respirology 2018; 23: 76–81.
    OpenUrl
    1. Naur T,
    2. Konge L,
    3. Clementsen P
    . Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without mediastinal nodal involvement at positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Respiration 2017; 94: 279–284.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Dooms C,
    2. Tournoy KG,
    3. Schuurbiers O, et al.
    Endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging of clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective multicenter study. Chest 2015; 147: 209–2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rami-Porta R,
    2. Call S,
    3. Dooms C, et al.
    Lung cancer staging: a concise update. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1800190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Decaluwé H,
    2. Dooms C,
    3. D'Journo XB, et al.
    Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective multicentre study. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701493.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Turna A,
    2. Demirkaya A,
    3. Ozkul S, et al.
    Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy is associated with better survival than mediastinoscopy in patients with resected non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146: 774–780.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Hürtgen M,
    2. Friedel G,
    3. Toomes H, et al.
    Radical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) – technique and first results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 348–35114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Witte B,
    2. Hürtgen M
    . Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA). J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2: 367–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Rusch VW,
    2. Asamura H,
    3. Watanabe H, et al.
    The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2009; 4: 568–577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Naur T,
    2. Konge L,
    3. Clementsen P
    . Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without mediastinal nodal involvement at positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Respiration 2017; 94: 279–284.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Yasufuku K,
    2. Nakajima T,
    3. Waddell T, et al.
    Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for differentiating N0 versus N1 lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96: 1756–1760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 14 Issue 4 Table of Contents
Breathe: 14 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer
Clementine Bostantzoglou, Marianthi Iliopoulou, Georgia Hardavella
Breathe Dec 2018, 14 (4) 342-344; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.027118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer
Clementine Bostantzoglou, Marianthi Iliopoulou, Georgia Hardavella
Breathe Dec 2018, 14 (4) 342-344; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.027118
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients, methods, study design and end-points
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung cancer
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Expert opinion

  • Lung cancer screening by volume CT
  • In pursuit of the primary
  • A rare complication in a case of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
Show more Expert opinion

Journal club

  • Impact of triple therapy on mortality in COPD
  • CPAP for secondary cardiovascular prevention in OSA patients
  • Maternal vaccination during pregnancy against infant respiratory viruses
Show more Journal club

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About Breathe

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Intructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 1810-6838
Online ISSN: 2073-4735

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society