Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Over- and under-diagnosis in asthma

Joanne Kavanagh, David J. Jackson, Brian D. Kent
Breathe 2019 15: e20-e27; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0362-2018
Joanne Kavanagh
1Guy's Asthma Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
2Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Jackson
1Guy's Asthma Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
2Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian D. Kent
1Guy's Asthma Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
2Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: brian.kent@gstt.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Tables

  • Table 1

    Diagnostic tests in asthma

     Risk of overdiagnosisRisk of underdiagnosisNotes
    Peak flow variability#,¶,+Patient may have variable technique and/or have inaccurately charted PEFR.Poorly sensitive (3–46% for identifying physician diagnosed asthma) [5].
    Less sensitive if carried out when asymptomatic.
    This test is dependent on patient effort and technique and it is unobserved.
    Patients need to do peak flows twice daily for 2 weeks and accurately chart them.
    Peak flow charts are easily available to healthcare professionals and low cost.
    Spirometry#,¶,+Obstructed spirometry may be due to other conditions (e.g. COPD, bronchiolitis obliterans).
    In the elderly a ratio of <0.7 can be normal.
    Usually a ratio of <0.7 (FEV1/FVC) is interpreted as obstructive; however, in the young a normal FEV1/FVC ratio is significantly higher than this, leading to possible false negatives.
    Normal spirometry at a single time point does not rule out asthma.
    Need to have reproducible results for this to be a reliable measurement and this is dependent on the operator and patient effort, and potentially on patient coughing etc.
    Widely available (but not universally in primary care).
    Bronchodilator response#,¶,+Patients may have reversibility in other diseases (e.g. COPD).Patients may have used a bronchodilator on the day of the test, or a long-acting one even 1–2 days before.
    If patients are well at the time of the test and have normal spirometry no response may be seen.
    In chronic asthma patients may develop fixed airflow obstruction.
    Need to have reproducible results for this to be a reliable measurement and this is dependent on the operator plus patient effort, and potentially limited by patient coughing etc.
    Widely available (but not universally in primary care).
    Measures of airway hyperresponsiveness
    Direct provocation (methacholine, histamine)#,¶,+
    Indirect provocation (mannitol, hypertonic saline, exercise, eucapnic hyperventilation)#,¶
    A proportion of the normal, asymptomatic population will have a positive test.
    False positives more likely in COPD, cystic fibrosis, allergic rhinitis.
    If patients are on asthma treatment the sensitivity of the test drops and a negative test does not rule out asthma.Generally not available in primary care.
    Of less value if patient has established airflow obstruction.
    FeNO+FeNO can be raised in other conditions (e.g. allergic rhinitis, eosinophilic bronchitis, COPD with an eosinophilic phenotype).FeNO is suppressed in smokers.
    Some asthmatics will not have eosinophilic airway inflammation at the time of testing (e.g. neutrophilic/paucigranulocytic asthma).
    Asthma patients who are already on ICS treatment may have a normal FeNO.
    Not consistently available in primary care.
    Blood eosinophilsMay be raised in numerous other conditions including COPD, allergic conditions, parasitic infections.Treated asthmatics or those who are not currently exacerbating may have normal blood eosinophils.
    Does not help identify non-eosinophilic asthmatics.
    Not a point of care test, so information not available to the treating clinician immediately.
    Sputum eosinophilsMay be raised in other conditions (e.g. COPD with an eosinophilic phenotype, eosinophilic bronchitis).May be suppressed by treatment with ICS or OCS.Only available in specialist centres, requires expertise and is expensive and time consuming.

    PEFR: peak expiratory flow rate; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; OCS: oral corticosteroids. #: GINA guidelines; ¶: BTS/SIGN guidelines; +: NICE guidelines.

    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Vol 15 Issue 1 Table of Contents
    Breathe: 15 (1)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Over- and under-diagnosis in asthma
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Over- and under-diagnosis in asthma
    Joanne Kavanagh, David J. Jackson, Brian D. Kent
    Breathe Mar 2019, 15 (1) e20-e27; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0362-2018

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Over- and under-diagnosis in asthma
    Joanne Kavanagh, David J. Jackson, Brian D. Kent
    Breathe Mar 2019, 15 (1) e20-e27; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0362-2018
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Diagnosing asthma
      • Overdiagnosis of asthma
      • Underdiagnosis of asthma
      • Summary
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Subjects

    • Asthma and allergy
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Pulmonary renal syndrome: a clinical review
    • Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer
    • Diagnosis and management of PH related to chronic respiratory disease
    Show more Reviews

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About Breathe

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Intructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN: 1810-6838
    Online ISSN: 2073-4735

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society