Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Bioartificial lungs based on de- and recellularisation approaches: a historical perspective

Sara Rolandsson Enes, Daniel J. Weiss
Breathe 2020 16: 200168; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0168-2020
Sara Rolandsson Enes
1Dept of Experimental Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sara.rolandsson_enes@med.lu
Daniel J. Weiss
2Dept of Medicine, 226 Health Science Research Facility, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A discussion of three landmark studies on bioartificial lungs published during 2010 that were instrumental in invigorating the lung regenerative medicine field https://bit.ly/31qQAEa

For patients with end-stage respiratory diseases, such as COPD, interstitial lung diseases and cystic fibrosis, lung transplantation remains the only treatable option. However, due to increasing demand and limited availability of donor lungs, risk of complications such as acute and chronic rejection, and adverse effects of immunosuppressive treatments, this is not an alternative for the majority of this patient group [1, 2]. To meet the rising clinical demand new strategies to increase the number of available lungs for transplantation are needed [2]. One such strategy involves creating a functional lung ex vivo using different de- and recellularisation approaches. In this article, we will provide an overview of three landmark studies on bioartificial lungs published during 2010 that set the base for the direction of this relatively young field.

Decellularised murine lung matrix bioreactor system

In this pioneering study, Price et al. [3] utilised a previously described detergent-based tissue decellularisation protocol and scaled it up for whole mouse lungs. Perfusion of detergents (Triton-X, Na deoxycholate) and other reagents through both the trachea and vasculature resulted in decellularised lungs that maintained their overall shape and both macroscopic and microscopic structure. Furthermore, the decellularised lungs were able to be ventilated in a bioreactor system for up to 14 days. Histological evaluation demonstrated that the decellularised mouse lungs had no remaining nuclei and that the extracellular matrix (ECM) was mostly visually intact. However, quantification of laminin and elastin in homogenates of the decellularised lungs demonstrated a significantly lower level compared to native lungs. Collagen levels were similar to those found in native lungs, and no matrix metalloprotease (MMP) activity was detected (MMP-2 and MMP-9). Levels of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) were also significantly decreased in decellularised lungs compared to levels in native lungs [3].

To evaluate if lung cells could repopulate the decellularised lung, 3 million fetal mouse lung cells were infused. Cryosections were taken after 7 days of ventilation, and CK18 (epithelial cells), pro-SP-C (ATII cells) and DAPI (nuclei) positive cells were detected in alveolar areas. No cells expressing aquaporin-5 (ATI cells), CD11b (macrophages), CD31 (endothelial cells), CCSP (Clara cells) or vimentin (fibroblasts) were found in the repopulated lung [3]. Assessment of mechanical properties of the decellularised lungs was performed using pressure–volume measurement tests obtained with a FlexiVent device. Compared to the native control lung, decellularised lungs had decreased compliance and increased resistance and elastance. No improvements were obtained after 7 days of ventilation or after repopulating the lung with 1 million fetal lung cells. Taken together, in this pioneering study Price et al. [3] decellularised whole mouse lungs that were kept in a bioreactor system in which they successfully repopulated the murine matrix with fetal alveolar type II cells.

Tissue-engineered rat lungs for in vivo implantation

In this study, Petersen et al. [4] used a different detergent (CHAPS)-based perfusion protocol to decellularise whole rat lungs. Similar to Price et al. [3] the lung was cannulated and the decellularisation solution was administered through both the trachea and the vasculature. Using this method, the alveolar micro-architecture, barrier function and tissue mechanics were found to be preserved. Although the overall macro- and microscopic lung architecture was intact, histological evaluations of the decellularised tissue showed that while collagen was preserved, elastin was partly depleted (60% removed), and more than 90% of the sulfated GAGs were removed by the decellularisation process [4].

To test the functional properties of the decellularised whole rat lung, the lung was mounted in a bioreactor designed to mimic the fetal lung environment. Culture media was perfused into the pulmonary artery and a negative pressure inflation was obtained by inhalation of media via a breathing loop. Next, neonatal lung epithelial cells were administered via the airway compartments and microvascular lung endothelial cells via the pulmonary artery to assess repopulation. The epithelial cells were observed to replicate with minimal apoptosis observed markers. Moreover, the negative pressure ventilation in the bioreactor was demonstrated to have beneficial effects on the repopulated epithelial cells, including enhanced survival in distal alveoli and in clearance of secretions. Ventilation with air increased the number of type I alveolar epithelial cells and ciliated columnar epithelial cells compared to ventilation with media. Compliance testing demonstrated that both acellular lungs and repopulated lungs had lower compliance compared to native lungs. However, the ultimate tensile stresses and the overall stress–strain relationships were similar between the three groups. To test if the de- and recellularisation protocols reported in this study worked on human lung tissue, human lung segments were decellularised for up to 6 h. Histological evaluation of the sections demonstrated complete cellular removal and an intact alveolar architecture. Next, segments were repopulated with human cord-blood endothelial progenitor cells and human lung epithelial carcinoma cells. Endothelial cells adhered to the vasculature and the epithelial cells to the alveolar surfaces and, therefore, the authors concluded that these protocols were applicable to human lung tissue [4].

Finally, the authors wanted to test if the engineered rat lungs were functional for short time periods (45–120 min) by implanting the lungs into a syngeneic rat model (orthotopic left lung). The repopulated lungs were found to be easily suturable to the recipient, no air leak was observed, and all lungs became perfused. The repopulated lungs were inflated with air, but the levels were less compared to the native lung. Histological evaluation demonstrated modest bleeding into airways. The partial pressure of oxygen increased in both the pulmonary artery and the left pulmonary vein; however it did not reach the values obtained in native lung. Although, the partial pressure in the bioengineered lung did not reach the values obtained in the native lung, the haemoglobin saturation was 100% for both the repopulated lung and the native lung. Taken together, in this study Petersen et al. [4] repopulated decellulariaed rat lung with neonatal lung cells and showed that the repopulated lung participated in gas exchange for a short period of time.

Orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial rat lung

Using another different detergent perfusion protocol (0.1% of sodium dodecyl sulfate), Ott et al. [5] successfully decellularised whole rat lungs. No evidence of remaining nuclei (except for scattered nuclear remnants in cartilaginous rings) or intracellular elements were found. Importantly, ECM proteins, as well as the matrix architecture of airways and vasculature, were found to be preserved. Using a similar approach, Ott et al. [5] evaluated the applicability of this protocol to human-sized organs including sheep, porcine and baboon lungs successfully.

To test if the decellularised whole lung could be repopulated and maintained ex vivo, a decellularised rat lung was repopulated with human umbilical cord endothelial cells (through the vasculature) and kept in a bioreactor system designed to simulate the fetal lung environment just prior to the transition to air breathing. After 5 days in culture, endothelial cells were demonstrated to be spread and engraft throughout the scaffold. Next, Ott et al. [5] combined the repopulation of endothelial cells (through the vasculature) with carcinomatous human alveolar basal epithelial cells (through the trachea). The repopulated scaffolds were maintained for 9 days, after 5 days of culture epithelial cells formed a monolayer, but after 6 days of culture cells started to form multilayer and obliteration of airways and loss of surface area was observed [5].

Decellularised cadaveric lungs repopulated with rat fetal lung cells and human umbilical cord endothelial cells was cultured under physiological conditions for up to 9 days. The architecture of large and small conducting airways, alveoli and vasculature was preserved, and the repopulation was reported to be successful. To test functional properties of the repopulated lungs the fluid ventilation was substituted with dry ventilation after 5 days in culture. The gas exchange of the fetal lung cells and human umbilical cord endothelial cells repopulated lungs matched the levels of native lungs regarding vital capacity and compliance. Finally, the bioengineered lungs were evaluated in vivo after orthotopic transplantation into normal rats. The transplantations were successful, and rats were extubated and maintained without ventilation support for 6 h. However, over the following several hours the rats developed pulmonary secretions without blood. Graft analysis demonstrated vascular and bronchial anastomoses and appeared oedematous, moreover high inspiratory pressure were needed for complete expansion. Taken together, in this proof of concept study Ott et al. [5] repopulated a cadaveric lung with endothelial and epithelial cells with a functional short-term gas exchange both in vitro and in vivo.

Lessons learned from the landmark studies

Although decellularisation of whole lung was first described in 1986 [6], these three landmark papers published in 2010 have been essential for reinventing the regenerative medicine field and have stimulated intensive investigation [3–5]. Common in these studies was that they all administered the decellularisation solutions through both the airway and the vascular system. Retention of both macro- and micro architecture was reported. However, degradation of laminin, elastin, and sulfated GAGs were found after the decellularisation process, although the degree of degradation was different between the different studies. Most importantly, these proof-of-concept studies demonstrated short-term gas exchange following implantation into rodents [5]. Although haemorrhage and thrombus formation were observed in the study by Petersen et al. [4] and substantial oedema was observed by Ott et al. [5], these ground breaking studies set the stage for the direction of the field.

Challenges and opportunities in the field: where do we stand?

Studies on creating a bioartificial lung based on de- and recellularisation approaches demonstrated promising results in the beginning of 21st century. However, the lack of satisfactory repopulation of functional cells and proper long-term gas exchange has hampered the progression of the field. The lung is a very complex mechanical organ composed of various cell types and ECM components [7]. The degradation of proteoglycans and their GAGs after the decellularisation process is an important observation that might be one of the explanations behind the lack of proper cell repopulation and tissue functionality [4, 6, 8]. GAGs are known to be involved in ECM organisation and assembly, as well as in remodelling processes during normal homeostasis [9]. Moreover, GAGs are important in the cell–ECM interactions and play an important role in directing cell behaviour [9, 10].

Moreover, a functional vasculature in bioengineered lungs is critical for proper graft function. Given the essential need for a functional and intact vasculature, Dorrello et al. [11] developed an airway-specific rat model in which they aimed to preserve the pulmonary vasculature and the ECM components. By histological staining the authors demonstrated removal of airway epithelium, while preserving a portion of parenchymal lung cells including endothelial cells (43%) and interstitial cells (32%) compared to the control. Importantly, the maintained blood vessels responded to both vasoconstrictors and vasodilators after the decellularisation process. Except for loss of epithelial cell-associated GAGs and decreased compliance, the lung architecture and matrix proteins were demonstrated to be fairly preserved [11]. In a recent study by Nichols et al. [12], the authors explored in vivo implantation of decellularised pig lungs seeded ex vivo with a variety of cells but without anastomosing the implant to the host vasculature. These studies are emblematic of both the advances and the challenges involved in recreating or preserving a functional pulmonary vasculature.

Another challenge is that the lung is a very complex organ consisting of numerous cell types. It is critical to understand which cells are most necessary for repopulating the decellularised lung. Repopulation could potentially be done with differentiated primary human cells, however this will require usage of multiple cell types either at the same time or sequentially. An alternative would be to repopulate the lung with progenitor cells or induced pluripotent stem cells and stimulate differentiation. The next important step will then be to guide the cells to their correct location within the scaffold. 3-dimensional printing and bioprinting are techniques that would be ideal to address these concerns, but due to technical limitations it has been a slow progression [13]. Further investigations are needed to develop bioreactor technologies designed to provide the lung with oxygen, nutrition and mechanical ventilation, as well as real-time lung function measurements [14]. In addition, some practical issues for translation into clinical settings involving potential immunogenicity, sterilisation protocols, evaluation methods, strategies to forecast outcomes, and the overall practicality of this approach, needs to be solved.

Summary

In the light of these studies, the enthusiasm for bioengineering lung using de- and recellularisation approaches was raised and the number of studies significantly increased in this fascinating field. Since 2010, several combinations of cells have been tested, de- and recellularisation protocols have been refined, and more advanced bioreactors have been developed [13–17]. However, the field is still struggling with the lack of long-term gas exchange and a successful recellularisation of the lung tissue with functional cells. Despite these limitations, there has been significant progression in this relatively young field with improved techniques and bioreactor devices, and hopefully ongoing studies will bring improved transplantable bioartificial lungs and hope for the future. Another possibility for the future of the artificial lung could potentially be to combine a gas exchanger with a pump creating a small device. This artificial lung could then potentially put human lung transplantations aside, avoiding many of the complications related to organ transplantation.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: S. Rolandsson Enes has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D.J. Weiss has nothing to disclose.

  • Received July 7, 2020.
  • Accepted October 13, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Breathe articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ng CY,
    2. Madsen JC,
    3. Rosengard BR, et al.
    Immunosuppression for lung transplantation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2009; 14: 1627–1641.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Chambers DC,
    2. Yusen RD,
    3. Cherikh WS, et al.
    The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fourth Adult Lung And Heart-Lung Transplantation Report-2017; Focus Theme: Allograft ischemic time. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36: 1047–1059. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.016
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Price AP,
    2. England KA,
    3. Matson AM, et al.
    Development of a decellularized lung bioreactor system for bioengineering the lung: the matrix reloaded. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16: 2581–2591. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0659
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Petersen TH,
    2. Calle EA,
    3. Zhao L, et al.
    Tissue-engineered lungs for in vivo implantation. Science 2010; 329: 538–541. doi:10.1126/science.1189345
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Ott HC,
    2. Clippinger B,
    3. Conrad C, et al.
    Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat Med 2010; 16: 927–933. doi:10.1038/nm.2193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Lwebuga-Mukasa JS,
    2. Ingbar DH,
    3. Madri JA
    . Repopulation of a human alveolar matrix by adult rat type II pneumocytes in vitro. A novel system for type II pneumocyte culture. Exp Cell Res 1986; 162: 423–435. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(86)90347-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Franks TJ,
    2. Colby TV,
    3. Travis WD, et al.
    Resident cellular components of the human lung: current knowledge and goals for research on cell phenotyping and function. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 763–766. doi:10.1513/pats.200803-025HR
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Uhl FE,
    2. Zhang F,
    3. Pouliot RA, et al.
    Functional role of glycosaminoglycans in decellularized lung extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater 2020; 102: 231–246. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.029
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Linhardt RJ,
    2. Toida T
    . Role of glycosaminoglycans in cellular communication. Acc Chem Res 2004; 37: 431–438. doi:10.1021/ar030138x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Soares da Costa D,
    2. Reis RL,
    3. Pashkuleva I
    . Sulfation of glycosaminoglycans and its implications in human health and disorders. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2017; 19: 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044610
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Dorrello NV,
    2. Guenthart BA,
    3. O'Neill JD, et al.
    Functional vascularized lung grafts for lung bioengineering. Sci Adv 2017; 3: e1700521. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700521
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Nichols JE,
    2. La Francesca S,
    3. Niles JA, et al.
    Production and transplantation of bioengineered lung into a large-animal model. Sci Transl Med 2018; 10: eaao3926. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3926
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. De Santis MM,
    2. Bolukbas DA,
    3. Lindstedt S, et al.
    How to build a lung: latest advances and emerging themes in lung bioengineering. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1601355. doi:10.1183/13993003.01355-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Panoskaltsis-Mortari A
    . Bioreactor development for lung tissue engineering. Curr Transplant Rep 2015; 2: 90–97. doi:10.1007/s40472-014-0048-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wagner DE,
    2. Bonvillain RW,
    3. Jensen T, et al.
    Can stem cells be used to generate new lungs? Ex vivo lung bioengineering with decellularized whole lung scaffolds. Respirology 2013; 18: 895–911. doi:10.1111/resp.12102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gilpin SE,
    2. Wagner DE
    . Acellular human lung scaffolds to model lung disease and tissue regeneration. Eur Respir Rev 2018; 27: 180021. doi:10.1183/16000617.0021-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Uriarte JJ,
    2. Uhl FE,
    3. Rolandsson Enes SE, et al.
    Lung bioengineering: advances and challenges in lung decellularization and recellularization. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2018; 23: 673–678. doi:10.1097/MOT.0000000000000584
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 16 Issue 4 Table of Contents
Breathe: 16 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bioartificial lungs based on de- and recellularisation approaches: a historical perspective
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Bioartificial lungs based on de- and recellularisation approaches: a historical perspective
Sara Rolandsson Enes, Daniel J. Weiss
Breathe Dec 2020, 16 (4) 200168; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0168-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bioartificial lungs based on de- and recellularisation approaches: a historical perspective
Sara Rolandsson Enes, Daniel J. Weiss
Breathe Dec 2020, 16 (4) 200168; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0168-2020
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Decellularised murine lung matrix bioreactor system
    • Tissue-engineered rat lungs for in vivo implantation
    • Orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial rat lung
    • Lessons learned from the landmark studies
    • Challenges and opportunities in the field: where do we stand?
    • Summary
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Expert opinion

  • Lung cancer screening by volume CT
  • In pursuit of the primary
  • A rare complication in a case of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
Show more Expert opinion

Landmark papers in respiratory medicine

  • Balloon pulmonary angioplasty: lessons learned and unanswered questions
  • A look back at the PANTHER-IPF trial
  • Impact of the meta-analysis of pulmonary rehabilitation by Lacasse et al.
Show more Landmark papers in respiratory medicine

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About Breathe

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Intructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 1810-6838
Online ISSN: 2073-4735

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society