The impact of the meta-analysis of pulmonary rehabilitation by Lacasse and colleagues: transforming pulmonary rehabilitation from “art to science”
Sarah Gephine, Carla Simonelli, Guido Vagheggini, Rachael Evans, Thomas J.C. Ward
Breathe 2022 18: 220021; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0021-2022
Sarah Gephine
1Univ. Lille, Univ. Artois, Univ. Littoral Côte D'opale, ULR 7369-Urepsss, Lille, France
6These authors contributed equally and share first authorship
Carla Simonelli
2Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation Division of the Institute of Lumezzane, Lumezzane, Italy
6These authors contributed equally and share first authorship
Guido Vagheggini
3Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, Dept of Medical Specialties, Chronic Respiratory Failure Care Pathway, Pisa, Italy
4Fondazione Volterra Ricerche ONLUS, Volterra, Italy
Rachael Evans
5Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Thomas J.C. Ward
5Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Vol 18 Issue 2
Table of Contents
The impact of the meta-analysis of pulmonary rehabilitation by Lacasse and colleagues: transforming pulmonary rehabilitation from “art to science”
Sarah Gephine, Carla Simonelli, Guido Vagheggini, Rachael Evans, Thomas J.C. Ward
Breathe Jun 2022, 18 (2) 220021; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0021-2022
Jump To
- Article
- Abstract
- Introduction
- The early years of PR
- The meta-analysis by Lacasse and colleagues: effectiveness of PR on exercise capacity and quality of life
- A comprehensive review, but what was missing?
- From research to practice: PR becomes the standard of care for COPD
- Where next for PR research?
- Conclusion
- Footnotes
- References
- Figures & Data
- Info & Metrics