Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Sarah Cullivan, Margaret Higgins, Sean Gaine
Breathe 2022 18: 220168; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0168-2022

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature that is characterised by elevated pressures within the pulmonary vascular tree. Recent decades have witnessed a dramatic expansion in our understanding of the pathobiology and the epidemiology of PAH, and improvements in treatment options and outcomes. The prevalence of PAH is estimated to be between 48 and 55 cases per million adults. The definition was recently amended and a diagnosis of PAH now requires evidence of a mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mmHg, a pulmonary vascular resistance >2 Wood units and a pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg at right heart catheterisation. Detailed clinical assessment and a number of additional diagnostic tests are required to assign a clinical group. Biochemistry, echocardiography, lung imaging and pulmonary function tests provide valuable information to assist in the assignment of a clinical group. Risk assessment tools have been refined, and these greatly facilitate risk stratification and enhance treatment decisions and prognostication. Current therapies target three therapeutic pathways: the nitric oxide, prostacyclin and endothelin pathways. While lung transplantation remains the only curative intervention for PAH, there are a number of promising therapies under investigation which may further reduce morbidity and improve outcomes.

This review describes the epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of PAH and introduces important concepts regarding the diagnosis and risk stratification of PAH. The management of PAH is also discussed, with a special focus on PAH specific therapy and key supportive measures.

Abstract

The preceding decades have witnessed significant improvements in our understanding of PAH and an expansion in treatment options. The haemodynamic definition of PAH has been refined and a number of risk assessment tools have been developed. https://bit.ly/3CKYNpV

Educational aims

  • To provide an introduction to the epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

  • To describe important diagnostic tests and risk assessment tools.

  • To outline the therapeutic pathways and important supportive measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a prevalent disease that is characterised by elevated pressures within the pulmonary circulation. The haemodynamic definition of PH requires right heart catheterisation (RHC) and demonstration of a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg [1, 2]. Detailed clinical assessment and a variety of additional investigations are required to assign a clinical group. Clinically, PH is classified into one of five distinct groups based on shared clinical, haemodynamic and treatment characteristics [1, 3]. These include group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), group 2 PH associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD), group 3 PH associated with lung disease and/or hypoxia, group 4 PH associated with pulmonary artery obstructions, and group 5 PH with unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms [1–3]. This review focuses on group 1 PAH and outlines important concepts surrounding the diagnosis, risk assessment and treatment of these cases.

Epidemiology

PAH is a progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature that is characterised by premature morbidity and mortality. The pathology of PAH was first published in 1891 by von Romberg, but it wasn't until 1951 that the first detailed clinical description of primary PH, now referred to as idiopathic PAH (IPAH), was published by Dresdale and co-workers [4]. The disease soon attracted international attention, due to the epidemic of anorexigen-associated PAH in the 1960s associated with the appetite suppressant aminorex [5]. This crisis inspired the first World Symposium on PH (WSPH), in 1973, and generated the first cohesive PH classification system. The classification has been further refined at subsequent WSPH and PAH is now assigned to Group 1 in the current classification system. Group 1 PAH is further divided into subgroups as outlined in table 1. These include subgroups such as IPAH, heritable PAH (HPAH), drug-associated PAH (DPAH) and PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH).

View this table:
TABLE 1

An overview of the clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH), with associated conditions and important investigations to consider

The true global incidence and prevalence of PAH are unknown. Analysis of contemporary registries indicate that PAH has an incidence and prevalence of approximately six and 48–55 cases per million adults, respectively [2]. The age at diagnosis varies, and often ranges from individuals in their forties to late sixties [9]. Specific PAH subgroups, such as HPAH, typically demonstrate a female predominance and may present at a younger age. However, the demographics of PAH are evolving and an equal sex distribution is often observed in older subjects. Furthermore, older individuals with PAH may have confounding comorbidities and present with more advanced and symptomatic disease. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required to avoid delayed or missed diagnoses [10].

Pathology

The pulmonary circulation is a high flow, low pressure circuit, which receives the entire cardiac output from the right heart. The pulmonary arteries transport deoxygenated blood from the right ventricle to the pulmonary capillaries for gas exchange. In PAH, there is pulmonary artery remodelling due to proliferation, inflammation and thrombosis in situ. This results in progressive luminal narrowing and leads to increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and right ventricular afterload, which culminates in right heart failure if left untreated. The histopathological changes in PAH involve all three layers of the pulmonary artery wall, including the intima, media, and adventitia.

Endothelial cells are the predominant cell type in the intima. In PAH, endothelial cells may adopt contractile and motility properties that are typical of cells of mesenchymal origin such as smooth muscle cells, a process that is termed endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition [11]. Concentric intimal fibrosis (onion-skin lesions) is also frequently noted, in association with plexiform lesions. Plexiform lesions are often considered the histological hallmark of PAH and they consist of organised vascular channels formed by the monoclonal proliferation of endothelial cells [12]. Their biological significance remains unclear, and it has been proposed that they may represent anastomosing bronchial and pulmonary circulations [13]. Thrombosis in situ, organised thrombotic lesions (termed “colander-like-lesions”) and atypical fibrovascular lesions (called singular millimetric fibrovascular lesions (SiMFis)) have also been described [14].

The media of pulmonary arteries are rich in smooth muscle cells, and these are often hyperplastic in PAH [15]. The surrounding adventitia is a diverse compartment, which is full of fibroblasts, inflammatory cells and pericytes [16, 17]. Altered fibroblasts characteristics, perivascular inflammation and ectopic lymphoid tissues are also commonly observed in PAH. Histopathological changes in capillaries, post-capillary venules and veins, bronchial vessels and the right ventricle have also been shown [14, 15].

Pathobiology

The pathobiology of PAH is complex and cannot be isolated to a single pathway or defect. The following section focuses on key molecular pathways and genetic factors that have been implicated in the pathobiology of PAH. However, a comprehensive overview of the pathobiology is beyond the scope of this review.

PAH is characterised by an imbalance of vasoactive mediators, with a relative deficiency of nitric oxide and prostacyclin, and an excess of endothelin and thromboxane [14]. In the pulmonary circulation, nitric oxide and prostacyclin are important vasodilators and replacement is an important therapeutic strategy [18]. Conversely, endothelin-1 is increased in PAH and attenuation of this pathway is another key therapeutic strategy in PAH [19, 20].

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling is imbalanced in PAH, with reduced signalling via the BMP pathway and increased signalling via the TGF-β pathway [21]. This results in a pro-proliferative environment and contributes to pulmonary vascular remodelling (figure 1). Mutations in the BMP receptor 2 (BMPR2) gene represent the main PAH susceptibility gene and carriers have a 20% lifetime risk of developing PAH [2, 4]. BMPR2 gene mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, with incomplete penetrance and a female preponderance [22, 23]. The difference in penetrance between female and male carriers (i.e. females with BMPR2 gene mutations are more likely to develop HPAH than males) indicates that additional factors are necessary for disease manifestation. This underscores the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors in the pathobiology of PAH. Several additional gene mutations have been identified and some of these are displayed in table 2.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling pathways in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the extracellular space, ligands such as such as BMP9 or BMP10 bind to BMP receptor 2 (BMPR2). This forms a heteromeric complex with ALK1 (activin receptor-like kinase 1 or ACVRL1) and associates with the co-receptor endoglin, to trigger a cascade of intracellular events, including the phosphorylation of receptor-regulated SMADs (small mothers against decapentaplegic), SMADs 1, 5 and 8 proteins. These proteins form a complex with the common mediator SMAD, named SMAD4, and translocate to the nucleus to modulate gene transcription. This pathway is disrupted in PAH, with resultant increased signalling via the TGFβR2/ALK-5/SMAD2 and SMAD3 pathway, and subsequent pro-proliferative signalling. This figure was created with BioRender.com.

View this table:
TABLE 2

Important pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) susceptibility genes

Assessment and investigations in PAH

Clinical history and examination

Comprehensive clinical assessment is essential to identify suspected cases of PH and to accurately assign a clinical group. Clinical symptoms of PAH are often nonspecific and may be difficult to differentiate from other cardiorespiratory conditions by history alone. Symptoms often include dyspnoea, fatigue, signs of right heart failure and syncope. Past medical history, prior diet pill and drug exposures, and family history of PAH should be explored in detail. Clinical examination may reveal signs of the underlying aetiology. For example, sclerodactyly, digital ulceration, telangiectasia and microstomia would be indicative of systemic sclerosis as the cause of PAH, while the presence of digital clubbing would guide the examiner to consider cyanotic congenital heart disease, interstitial lung disease (ILD) or liver disease as potential aetiologies [3]. Furthermore, clinical assessment of volume status is important to guide decisions regarding right heart function, risk stratification and diuretic therapies.

Investigations

Routine full blood count, liver and renal profiles, thyroid function tests, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) should be requested in all patients. A number of additional blood tests should be requested at baseline for specific conditions that are associated with PAH, as highlighted in table 1. These include HIV and hepatitis screens and CTD panels including serum antinuclear antibody, anti-centromere antibodies and dsDNA antibodies [3]. Genetic counselling, consent and testing should be considered in specific PAH subgroups such as IPAH, suspected HPAH and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) (table 2) [3, 6].

Pulmonary function tests

Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) provide very helpful information in PH [3]. Spirometry can assess for underlying obstructive or restrictive lung disease and the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) can provide prognostic information [28]. Additionally, the DLCO might suggest specific diagnoses, as marked reductions (e.g. <45%) are often associated with PVOD, systemic sclerosis associated PAH and ILD (group 3 PH). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has a typical pattern in subjects with pulmonary vascular disease, demonstrating a low end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide, high ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production), low oxygen pulse (oxygen uptake/heart rate), and low peak oxygen uptake (VʹO2) [2]. This can be useful to phenotype and risk stratify patients with PAH.

Echocardiography

Echocardiography is one of the most important diagnostic tests to consider in subjects with suspected PH. Measurement of the peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and additional echocardiographic variables in symptomatic subjects can estimate the probability of PH [3]. This can be stratified as low, intermediate or high probability and can guide decisions regarding which patients would benefit from additional RHC. A peak TRV >3.4 m·s−1 suggests a high probability of PH in a symptomatic patient. Conversely, a peak TRV ≤2.8 m·s−1 in the absence of other PH echocardiography signs indicates a low probability of PH [2].

Echocardiographic parameters also facilitate comprehensive risk assessment in subjects with established PAH [2]. The right atrial area, the presence of a pericardial effusion and the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) are meaningful prognostic parameters in PAH. The TAPSE/PASP ratio is a valuable, noninvasive indication of right ventricle and pulmonary artery coupling, which is typically impaired in severe PAH [2].

Radiology

A number of radiological investigations are valuable in the assessment of subjects with PAH. These include chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) and ventilation–perfusion (Vʹ/Qʹ) imaging. CT pulmonary angiogram can assess for parenchymal lung disease and for features of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Vʹ/Qʹ imaging of the lungs is important to exclude distal CTEPH, which might otherwise be missed. Doppler ultrasound of the liver and portal system should be performed to exclude underlying portal hypertension and cirrhosis. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in the assessment of subjects with PAH has evolved and the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PH incorporate cMRI into the updated risk stratification table [2]. These parameters include cMRI right ventricular end-systolic volume index, right ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume index.

Invasive diagnostics

Right heart catheterisation

RHC is an invasive test that provides direct access to pulmonary haemodynamics. The first human RHC was performed in 1929 by the newly qualified Dr Werner Forssmann on himself [29]. This was subsequently refined by Cournand and Richards in the 1940s and their collective work received the Nobel Prize in 1956 [4]. RHC is a technically demanding and nuanced procedure and there are specific recommendations regarding the execution of these procedures [3]. Ideally, RHC and vasoreactivity testing should be performed in expert centres, where they are typically associated with low morbidity and mortality [30].

The information obtained from RHC should be combined with clinical characteristics to assign patients to one of five clinical groups. This information can be used to facilitate risk stratification and prognostication. A resting mPAP >20 mmHg at RHC is diagnostic of PH [1]. This threshold was reduced from a mPAP of ≥25 mmHg at the sixth WSPH, reflecting that 20 mmHg is the upper limit of normal, and that a normal mPAP is 14±3 mmHg [3, 31]. Once PH is confirmed, the haemodynamic pattern can be described using the mPAP, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and PVR [2].

Haemodynamic patterns at RHC:

  • Pre-capillary:

    • mPAP >20 mmHg, PVR >2 Wood units (WU), PAWP ≤15 mmHg

  • Post-capillary:

    • mPAP >20 mmHg, PVR ≤2 WU, PAWP >15 mmHg

  • Combined pre- and post-capillary:

    • mPAP >20 mmHg, PVR >2 WU, PAWP >15 mmHg

Consideration of the PAWP is necessary to accurately interpret RHC results and differentiate pre-capillary from post-capillary disease. The PAWP is obtained by inflating a balloon at the tip of the catheter and wedging it into a distal pulmonary artery, in order to occlude it. This creates a static column of blood from the occluded pulmonary artery to the left heart, that is used to estimate left atrial pressure. A normal PAWP ranges from 6 to 12 mmHg and values higher than this are indicative of underlying left heart disease. However, the measurement is affected by intrathoracic swings in pressure during the respiratory cycle, which can be particularly pronounced in subjects with underlying lung disease. Therefore, if there is any uncertainty regarding the accuracy of this measurement, then left heart catheterisation (LHC) via arterial access and measurement of the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) should be considered [3, 32].

Another key measurement at RHC is the PVR. The PVR describes the resistance to blood flow through the pulmonary vasculature, which is elevated in PAH. The updated haemodynamic definition of PAH uses a PVR threshold of >2 WU to diagnose PAH. This is reduced from the former threshold of >3 WU [2]. The PVR is calculated as a ratio of the transpulmonary gradient to cardiac output using the following equation [33]: Embedded Image

Additional important RHC parameters include the cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), stroke volume index (SVI) and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) [2].

Vasoreactivity testing

All patients with IPAH, HPAH and DPAH should undergo acute vasoreactivity testing. This involves the administration of a vasoactive agent such as inhaled nitric oxide or inhaled iloprost during RHC [2]. Less than 10% of these patients will have an acute response during vasoreactivity testing and even less will maintain long-term responsiveness. However, those that do can be treated with long-term calcium channel blockers and typically have a favourable prognosis [34]. Vasoreactivity testing is not routinely performed in other PAH subgroups or PH groups as the diagnostic yield is low and the test may result in unwanted side-effects, such as pulmonary oedema [3]. The definitions of an acute and a long-term responder are as follows [34].

Acute responder:

  • mPAP reduction of ≥10 mmHg (to a value ≤40 mmHg)

  • Cardiac output increased/maintained (i.e. does not drop with testing)

Long-term responder:

  • Sustained clinical (i.e. functional class I/II), biochemical (B-type natriuretic peptide <50 ng·L−1 or NT-proBNP <300 ng·L−1) and haemodynamic response to calcium channel blocker monotherapy for greater than 12 months

Screening in specific populations

Screening high-risk populations for PAH is important, as early diagnosis and treatment may lead to better long-term outcomes [3]. Current screening strategies focus on specific populations with a high prevalence of PAH; namely, first-degree relatives of individuals with HPAH, patients with portal hypertension undergoing assessment for liver transplantation and individuals with systemic sclerosis [35].

The DETECT algorithm is a two-step screening tool that was designed to identify PAH in asymptomatic individuals with systemic sclerosis, due to the high prevalence of the disease in this group. Step 1 of the algorithm determines which patients will require echocardiography and step 2 suggests who would benefit from additional RHC. Step 1 examines six variables: forced vital capacity % predicted/DLCO % predicted, current/past telangiectasias, anti-centromere antibodies, NT-proBNP, serum urate and right axis deviation on ECG. Step 2 incorporates right atrial area and TRV at echocardiography to determine whether RHC is required [36]. Screening tools such as these are invaluable to augment clinical decision making and to identify PAH at an earlier stage. It should be noted, that if subjects with systemic sclerosis require RHC, caution is advised in those with severe Raynaud phenomenon or digital ulceration, as the radial approach can result in digital ischaemia.

Risk assessment in PAH

Comprehensive risk assessment in PAH is multifaceted, dynamic and an important component of individualised patient care. A number of scores, tables and equations have been developed to facilitate this. The National Institutes of Health equation was the first prognostic equation dedicated to risk assessment in PAH [37]. This used three RHC parameters: mPAP, mRAP and cardiac index. Since then, risk assessment has evolved and typically incorporates various clinical, laboratory, imaging and haemodynamic parameters, as outlined in table 3.

View this table:
TABLE 3

Overview of some of the risk assessment tools for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)

Decisions regarding which assessment tool to use in day-to-day clinical practice are often guided by individual physician preference. Popular risk stratification tools include the ESC/ERS risk stratification table and the REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management) registry risk equations and scores [2, 3, 41, 49–52]. The ESC/ERS risk stratification table was recently updated in the revised 2022 guidelines [2]. Multiparametric risk assessment is used to estimate the 1-year mortality risk and divides patients into low (<5%), intermediate (5–20%) and high risk (>20%) strata [2]. At follow-up visits, a noninvasive four-strata model is now recommended, using World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walking distance and NT-proBNP. Patients are divided into low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high and high-risk groups [2].

The REVEAL registry risk equation and scores were derived using statistical methods and consist of 12–14 weighted, modifiable and non-modifiable variables. Risk is divided into five strata in order to provide an estimation of the likelihood of survival in the next 12 months [41, 49–52]. Several additional risk stratification tools have been developed using the REVEAL registry, including the REVEAL 1.0 risk score calculator [49], simplified noninvasive REVEAL model [53], REVEAL 2.0 risk calculator [51], REVEAL Lite 2 [54] and PHORA risk prediction model [55].

Accurate risk assessment guides treatment decisions and prognostication. When used appropriately and at regular intervals, these tools augment clinical judgement. The acquisition and maintenance of a low-risk profile is the goal of care and is consistently associated with a favourable prognosis [41, 50, 52]. Failure to do so should prompt further interventions, including escalation of PAH therapy and consideration of referral for lung transplant assessment. Some of the risk stratification tools are outlined in table 3.

Management and treatment

Individuals with PAH should be managed by multidisciplinary teams in expert centres. As it is a rare and progressive disease, a dynamic and person-centred approach is required. Typically, there is no “one-size-fits-all” and individual patient characteristics and needs may change over time. This section provides a brief introduction to PAH specific therapy and important supportive measures.

PAH specific therapy

The first approved drug for PAH was parenteral epoprostenol in 1995 [56]. Epoprostenol is a synthetic prostacyclin analogue that is administered by continuous intravenous infusion via a permanent central venous catheter. It is a potent, short-acting vasodilator and inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Monotherapy with epoprostenol was revolutionary for a disease that had a median survival of 2.8 years from the time of diagnosis. It led to improvements in exercise capacity, haemodynamic profiles and a reduction in mortality in individuals with IPAH [57]. More therapies subsequently became available and in modern practice, there are three central treatment pathways: the prostacyclin, nitric oxide and endothelin pathways [3].

Endothelial dysfunction in the pulmonary vasculature in PAH is associated with reduced levels of endogenous nitric oxide and prostacyclin, and increased levels of endothelin-1. This results in an imbalance of vasoactive mediators, leading to vasoconstriction and remodelling in the pulmonary circulation. The aim of therapy is to restore this balance, by augmenting nitric oxide and prostacyclin pathways, and attenuating endothelin signalling. It is common practice to prescribe a combination of PAH specific therapies, using one drug from each of these pathways (table 4). Initial double combination therapy is recommended for most patients, with a view to achieving a low-risk profile. The first clinic visit following the initiation of PAH specific therapy is an important time for risk assessment and stratification, as additional PAH specific therapies should be considered for individuals who do not achieve low risk on double combination therapy [3].

View this table:
TABLE 4

An overview of the three major therapeutic pathways in pulmonary arterial hypertension

The vasodilatory properties of these drugs may result in systemic side-effects, particularly during drug initiation and dose titration [4]. These commonly include hypotension, flushing, light-headedness and gastrointestinal symptoms, as outlined in table 4 [4]. Specific side-effects also include anaemia (macitentan), ocular changes (e.g. conjunctival injection, changes in colour vision and photosensitivity with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors such as sildenafil), elevated aminotransferases (bosentan) and thrombocytopenia (parenteral prostacyclin). Patients prescribed parenteral prostacyclin via central venous catheters require special consideration, as they are at risk of line infections. Furthermore, infusion pump malfunction may interrupt drug delivery and result in acute deteriorations. Therefore, vigilance regarding sterile drug preparation and pump maintenance are essential.

Monotherapy with high-dose calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are prescribed for subjects with PAH that are long-term responders to CCBs only. It is important to be aware that CCBs may be prescribed in other PAH subgroups for alternative indications, such as Raynaud phenomenon in systemic sclerosis associated PAH.

PAH therapy is a dynamic and evolving field and there are numerous clinical trials underway. There has been a concerted drive by the global PH community to discover new drugs and therapeutic pathways. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that modulates TGF-β and BMPR2 signalling, and it is currently undergoing phase 3 studies. This may provide a much needed additional fourth therapeutic pathway [58]. Additional therapies and routes of administration are under investigation, such as the inhaled tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04903730).

Supportive measures

General supportive measures are a central and constant component of comprehensive PAH care. Supplemental oxygen and diuretic therapies should be considered in individuals with evidence of hypoxia or volume overload. Vaccinations, psychological support, nutritional advice and specialised exercise programmes should be offered to all patients. Exercise training and rehabilitation are safe and efficacious add-ons to medical therapy in stable patients with PH [59]. Evidence suggests that these programmes can improve exercise capacity, haemodynamic profiles, muscle strength, quality of life and wellbeing in individuals with PAH [59]. In light of the high maternal mortality in PAH, reliable contraception is imperative for women of reproductive age. Empiric anticoagulation for IPAH, APAH and HPAH is no longer routinely prescribed, due to the paucity of high-quality evidence surrounding this practice. Decisions regarding empiric anticoagulation in these subgroups should be made on a case-by-case basis and in expert centres [3].

Timely referral for lung transplant assessment should be considered in eligible patients, as it remains the only cure for this progressive disease. Palliative care is a valuable and underused resource in PAH management, and can alleviate chronic symptom burden and support end-of-life care. Finally, atrial septostomy can be considered in select individuals with advanced PAH, as a bridge to transplant or as a palliative procedure [60, 61]. This procedure creates a shunt from the right to the left atrium, and can improve symptoms and haemodynamic parameters in advanced PAH by offloading the failing right ventricle. However, as oxygen saturations will deteriorate due to the creation of a shunt, some individuals will not be suitable for this procedure.

Conclusion

The preceding decades have witnessed significant improvements in our understanding of PAH. The fourth edition of the ESC/ERS guidelines (2022) provides a comprehensive overview of the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with PH. The haemodynamic definition of PH has been revised and a diagnostic threshold of a mPAP >20 mmHg has been chosen to define PH. The therapeutic consequences of this new definition are of immense clinical interest and relevance [2]. Furthermore, new diagnostic, risk stratification and treatment algorithms have been developed and appropriate standards for PH centres have been proposed. There is a greater appreciation for the role of the TGF-β superfamily in the pathobiology of the disease and a number of novel therapies are under investigation. It is an exciting time to work in this evolving field and witness the expansion in treatment options.

Key points

  • A mPAP >20 mmHg at RHC is required to confirm PH. However, the mPAP provides little prognostic information and is not a core component of risk stratification.

  • Vasoreactivity testing should be performed during initial RHC in subjects with IPAH, HPAH and DPAH.

  • A radial approach to RHC should be avoided in subjects with systemic sclerosis associated PAH and severe Raynaud phenomenon or digital ulceration, due to the risk of distal ischaemia.

  • Marked reductions in DLCO in individuals with PH may be suggestive of PVOD, systemic sclerosis associated PAH and ILD.

Self-evaluation questions

  1. A 25-year-old woman presents to her general practitioner with syncope on exertion and is referred to the local emergency department for further investigations. A CT pulmonary angiogram reveals pulmonary artery dilatation and an enlarged right heart, and the study is negative for a pulmonary embolism. RHC and vasoreactivity testing are requested to investigate for PH. The results of the vasoreactivity test with inhaled nitric oxide are shown below.

    View this table:
       Which of the following statements regarding these results is/are correct?

    • a) This is a positive vasoreactivity test and this patient is a long-term responder to calcium channel blockers.

    • b) Therapeutic anticoagulation should be prescribed in this case.

    • c) Pulmonary hypertension has been excluded in this case.

    • d) This patient should be referred for lung transplant assessment.

    • e) This patient has a positive vasoreactivity test and is an acute responder to nitric oxide.

  2. True or false: exercise training and rehabilitation are absolutely contraindicated in subjects with PAH due to the risk of increasing pulmonary artery pressures and precipitating right heart failure.

  3. True or false: treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists such as bosentan may cause abnormal liver function tests.

  4. A 23-year-old man presents to a respiratory clinic with progressive dyspnoea, limb oedema and one episode of syncope. He has no medical history and is a never-smoker. On examination, he is hypoxic (saturations 84% on room air at rest) and has evidence of right heart failure. CT thorax revealed septal lines, centrilobular ground-glass opacities and there is mediastinal adenopathy. Pulmonary function tests reveal a DLCO of 36%, with normal spirometry, and echocardiography shows a normal left atrium and left ventricle and an enlarged right heart. Subsequent RHC confirms PH, and shows a mPAP of 58 mmHg, PAWP of 8 mmHg and a PVR of 12 Wood units. The initiation of PAH specific therapy is complicated by pulmonary oedema. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?

    • a) Group 3 PH due to chronic obstructive lung disease

    • b) PAH long-term responder to calcium channel blockers

    • c) PVOD

    • d) Group 2 PH, due to heart failure preserved ejection fraction

    • e) Portopulmonary hypertension

Suggested answers

1. Correct answer: e. This patient has a positive vasoreactivity test and is an acute responder to nitric oxide. Following the administration of inhaled nitric oxide, the mPAP reduced by ≥10 mmHg from baseline values, and the cardiac output increased. This is a positive vasoreactivity test and she is a candidate for trial of treatment with calcium channel blockers.

  Incorrect answers:

  •    a. While this is a positive vasoreactivity test, we do not have enough information to define this patient as a “long-term responder” to calcium channel blockers. This would require evidence of a sustained clinical, biochemical and haemodynamic response to calcium channel blocker monotherapy, typically for more than a year.

  •    b. There is no indication for therapeutic anticoagulation in this case.

  •    c. This is incorrect. PH has been diagnosed in this case, as the mPAP was 38 mmHg at baseline (i.e. >20 mmHg).

  •    d. There is not enough information to indicate that this patient requires referral for lung transplant assessment.

2. False. This statement is incorrect. Exercise training and rehabilitation are encouraged in subjects with stable, chronic PAH, and are considered safe and efficacious.

3. True. Bosentan is associated with deranged transaminases, which may even require drug cessation.

4. Correct answer: c. PVOD is the most likely diagnosis given the clinical findings, CT results and markedly reduced DLCO.

  Incorrect answers:

  •    a. This patient is a never-smoker and there is no history of lung disease, so Group 3 PH due to COPD is less likely.

  •    b. Information regarding vasoreactivity testing was not provided in this case and therefore it is not possible to diagnose a PAH long-term responder to calcium channel blockers.

  •    d. The patient’s young age, lack of comorbidities, normal left heart size on imaging and precapillary haemodynamic pattern at RHC make Group 2 PH less likely.

  •    e. There is no history of liver disease and liver/portal imaging is not provided in this case. Therefore, portopulmonary hypertension was not the diagnosis in this case.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: S. Cullivan is the Janssen Pharmaceuticals Newman Fellow in pulmonary hypertension and translational medicine. Janssen Pharmaceuticals had no input in the submitted work and no funding was received for same. M. Higgins has no conflicts of interest to disclose. S. Gaine has received honoraria and speaker's fees from Actelion and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and is an advisory board member for United Therapeutics, outside the submitted work.

  • Received July 8, 2022.
  • Accepted October 3, 2022.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Breathe articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Simonneau G,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Celermajer DS, et al.
    Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801913. doi:10.1183/13993003.01913-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Kovacs G,
    3. Hoeper MM, et al.
    2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2022; in press [https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00879-2022].
  3. ↵
    1. Galie N,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Vachiery JL, et al.
    2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 903–975. doi:10.1183/13993003.01032-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Hassoun PM
    . Pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 2361–2376. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2000348
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Kay JM,
    2. Smith P,
    3. Heath D
    . Aminorex and the pulmonary circulation. Thorax 1971; 26: 262–270. doi:10.1136/thx.26.3.262
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Morrell NW,
    2. Aldred MA,
    3. Chung WK, et al.
    Genetics and genomics of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801899. doi:10.1183/13993003.01899-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Galiè N,
    2. Hoeper MM,
    3. Humbert M, et al.
    Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2493–2537. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp297
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vachiéry J-L,
    2. Tedford RJ,
    3. Rosenkranz S, et al.
    Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801897. doi:10.1183/13993003.01897-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Leber L,
    2. Beaudet A,
    3. Muller A
    . Epidemiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: identification of the most accurate estimates from a systematic literature review. Pulm Circ 2021; 11: 2045894020977300. doi:10.1177/2045894020977300
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hoeper MM,
    2. Simon J,
    3. Gibbs R
    . The changing landscape of pulmonary arterial hypertension and implications for patient care. Eur Respir Rev 2014; 23: 450–457. doi:10.1183/09059180.00007814
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Piera-Velazquez S,
    2. Jimenez SA
    . Endothelial to mesenchymal transition: role in physiology and in the pathogenesis of human diseases. Physiol Rev 2019; 99: 1281–1324. doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Croix CMS,
    2. Steinhorn RH
    . New thoughts about the origin of plexiform lesions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 484–485. doi:10.1164/rccm.201510-1959ED
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Galambos C,
    2. Sims-Lucas S,
    3. Abman SH, et al.
    Intrapulmonary bronchopulmonary anastomoses and plexiform lesions in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 574–576. doi:10.1164/rccm.201507-1508LE
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Guignabert C,
    3. Bonnet S, et al.
    Pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension: state of the art and research perspectives. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801887. doi:10.1183/13993003.01887-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ghigna M-R,
    2. Dorfmüller P
    . Pulmonary vascular disease and pulmonary hypertension. Diagn Histopathol 2019; 25: 304–312. doi:10.1016/j.mpdhp.2019.05.002
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Spiekerkoetter E,
    2. Goncharova EA,
    3. Guignabert C, et al.
    Hot topics in the mechanisms of pulmonary arterial hypertension disease: cancer-like pathobiology, the role of the adventitia, systemic involvement, and right ventricular failure. Pulm Circ 2019; 9: 2045894019889775. doi:10.1177/2045894019889775
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Stenmark KR,
    2. Yeager ME,
    3. El Kasmi KC, et al.
    The adventitia: essential regulator of vascular wall structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol 2013; 75: 23–47. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Lannan KL,
    2. Phipps RP,
    3. White RJ
    . Thrombosis, platelets, microparticles and PAH: more than a clot. Drug Discov Today 2014; 19: 1230–1235. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.04.001
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Dupuis J,
    2. Hoeper MM
    . Endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 407–415. doi:10.1183/09031936.00078207
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Chester AH,
    2. Yacoub MH
    . The role of endothelin-1 in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2014; 2014: 62–78. doi:10.5339/gcsp.2014.29
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Guignabert C,
    2. Humbert M
    . Targeting transforming growth factor-β receptors in pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2002341. doi:10.1183/13993003.02341-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Eyries M,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Nadaud S, et al.
    Widening the landscape of heritable pulmonary hypertension mutations in paediatric and adult cases. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801371. doi:10.1183/13993003.01371-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Larkin EK,
    2. Newman JH,
    3. Austin ED, et al.
    Longitudinal analysis casts doubt on the presence of genetic anticipation in heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 892–896. doi:10.1164/rccm.201205-0886OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Girerd B,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Coulet F, et al.
    Clinical outcomes of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients carrying an ACVRL1 (ALK1) mutation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 851–861. doi:10.1164/rccm.200908-1284OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Girerd B,
    2. Weatherald J,
    3. Montani D, et al.
    Heritable pulmonary hypertension: from bench to bedside. Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26: 170037. doi:10.1183/16000617.0037-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kerstjens-Frederikse WS,
    2. Bongers EM,
    3. Roofthooft MT, et al.
    TBX4 mutations (small patella syndrome) are associated with childhood-onset pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Med Genet 2013; 50: 500–506. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101152
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Eyries M,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Girerd B, et al.
    EIF2AK4 mutations cause pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, a recessive form of pulmonary hypertension. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 65–69. doi:10.1038/ng.2844
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Stadler S,
    2. Mergenthaler N,
    3. Lange TJ
    . The prognostic value of DLCO and pulmonary blood flow in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Pulm Circ 2019; 9: 2045894019894531. doi:10.1177/2045894019894531
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Forssmann W
    . Die Sondierung des rechten Herzens [Probing of the right heart]. Klin Wochenschr 1929; 8: 2085–2087. doi:10.1007/BF01875120
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Hoeper MM,
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Voswinckel R, et al.
    Complications of right heart catheterization procedures in patients with pulmonary hypertension in experienced centers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2546–2552. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.061
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Kovacs G,
    2. Berghold A,
    3. Scheidl S, et al.
    Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 888–894. doi:10.1183/09031936.00145608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Kubiak GM,
    2. Ciarka A,
    3. Biniecka M, et al.
    Right heart catheterization – background, physiological basics, and clinical implications. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 1331. doi:10.3390/jcm8091331
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Rosenkranz S,
    2. Preston IR
    . Right heart catheterisation: best practice and pitfalls in pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 2015; 24: 642–652. doi:10.1183/16000617.0062-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Sitbon O,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Jaïs X, et al.
    Long-term response to calcium channel blockers in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2005; 111: 3105–3111. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.488486
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kiely DG,
    2. Lawrie A,
    3. Humbert M
    . Screening strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J Suppl 2019; 21: Suppl. K, K9–K20. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/suz204
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Coghlan JG,
    2. Denton CP,
    3. Grünig E, et al.
    Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 1340–1349. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203301
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. D'Alonzo GE,
    2. Barst RJ,
    3. Ayres SM, et al.
    Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 343–349. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-5-343
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thenappan T,
    2. Shah SJ,
    3. Rich S, et al.
    Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 1079–1087. doi:10.1183/09031936.00072709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Sitbon O,
    3. Yaïci A, et al.
    Survival in incident and prevalent cohorts of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 549–555. doi:10.1183/09031936.00057010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Sitbon O,
    3. Chaouat A, et al.
    Survival in patients with idiopathic, familial, and anorexigen-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Circulation 2010; 122: 156–163. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.911818
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Miller DP,
    3. Gomberg-Maitland M, et al.
    Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation 2010; 122: 164–172. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.898122
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lee W-TN,
    2. Ling Y,
    3. Sheares KK, et al.
    Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the UK. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 604–611. doi:10.1183/09031936.00196611
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nickel N,
    2. Golpon H,
    3. Greer M, et al.
    The prognostic impact of follow-up assessments in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 589–596. doi:10.1183/09031936.00092311
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Boucly A,
    2. Weatherald J,
    3. Savale L, et al.
    Risk assessment, prognosis and guideline implementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700889. doi:10.1183/13993003.00889-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hoeper MM,
    2. Kramer T,
    3. Pan Z, et al.
    Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700740. doi:10.1183/13993003.00740-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kylhammar D,
    2. Kjellström B,
    3. Hjalmarsson C, et al.
    A comprehensive risk stratification at early follow-up determines prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 4175–4181. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx257
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Xiong W,
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Xu M, et al.
    A modified risk score in one-year survival rate assessment of group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension. BMC Pulm Med 2018; 18: 161. doi:10.1186/s12890-018-0712-7
    OpenUrl
    1. Hoeper MM,
    2. Pausch C,
    3. Olsson KM, et al.
    COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2022; 60: 2102311. doi:10.1183/13993003.02311-2021
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Gomberg-Maitland M,
    3. Miller DP, et al.
    The REVEAL registry risk score calculator in patients newly diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2012; 141: 354–362. doi:10.1378/chest.11-0676
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Farber HW,
    3. Selej M, et al.
    Assessing risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension: what we know, what we don't. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701353. doi:10.1183/13993003.01353-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Gomberg-Maitland M,
    3. Elliott CG, et al.
    Predicting survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: the REVEAL risk score calculator 2.0 and comparison with ESC/ERS-based risk assessment strategies. Chest 2019; 156: 323–337. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.004
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Galiè N,
    2. Channick RN,
    3. Frantz RP, et al.
    Risk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801889. doi:10.1183/13993003.01889-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Cogswell R,
    2. Pritzker M,
    3. De Marco T
    . Performance of the REVEAL pulmonary arterial hypertension prediction model using non-invasive and routinely measured parameters. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33: 382–387. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2013.12.015
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Kanwar MK,
    3. Raina A, et al.
    Development and validation of an abridged version of the REVEAL 2.0 risk score calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for use in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2021; 159: 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2069
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Kanwar MK,
    2. Gomberg-Maitland M,
    3. Hoeper M, et al.
    Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension using Bayesian analysis. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2000008. doi:10.1183/13993003.00008-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Sitbon O,
    2. Vonk Noordegraaf A
    . Epoprostenol and pulmonary arterial hypertension: 20 years of clinical experience. Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26: 160055. doi:10.1183/16000617.0055-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Barst RJ,
    2. Rubin LJ,
    3. Long WA, et al.
    A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 296–301. doi:10.1056/NEJM199602013340504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. McLaughlin V,
    3. Gibbs JSR, et al.
    Sotatercept for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 1204–1215. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2024277
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Grünig E,
    2. Eichstaedt C,
    3. Barberà JA, et al.
    ERS statement on exercise training and rehabilitation in patients with severe chronic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1800332. doi:10.1183/13993003.00332-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Sandoval J,
    2. Gaspar J,
    3. Peña H, et al.
    Effect of atrial septostomy on the survival of patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2011; 38: 1343–1348. doi:10.1183/09031936.00072210
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Khan MS,
    2. Memon MM,
    3. Amin E, et al.
    Use of balloon atrial septostomy in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2019; 156: 53–63. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Email
Print
Citation Tools

Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Sarah Cullivan, Margaret Higgins, Sean Gaine
Breathe Dec 2022, 18 (4) 220168; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0168-2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

Subjects