Tables
- TABLE 1
Main characteristics of the IMPACT and ETHOS trials
Study (study period) Inclusion/exclusion criteria Treatment Included patients Characteristics of patients at inclusion Age and symptoms FEV1 and exacerbation history# History of asthma/ eosinophils ICS use before inclusion Treatment arms Mean age, years Men (%) Mean blood Eosinophils Bronchodilator reversibility IMPACT (2014–2017) Age ≥40 years
CAT ≥10FEV1 <50% and ≥1 moderate-to-severe exacerbation
OR
50%<FEV1<80% and ≥1 severe exacerbation or ≥2 moderate exacerbationsPrior (but not current) history of asthma allowed
No restriction regarding blood eosinophils70% Randomisation 2:2:1 ratio:
1) ICS (FF)+LAMA (UMEC)+LABA (VI) (triple therapy);
2) ICS (FF)+LABA (VI);
3) LAMA (UMEC)+LABA (VI)10 355 65 66% 170 cells per mm3 18% ETHOS (2015–2019) Age 40–80 years
CAT ≥10FEV1 <50% and ≥1 moderate-to-severe exacerbation
OR
50%<FEV1<65% and ≥1 severe exacerbation or ≥2 moderate exacerbationPrior (but not current) history of asthma allowed
No restriction regarding blood eosinophils80% Randomisation 1:1:1:1 ratio:
1) ICS (BUD 320 µg)+LABA (FOR)+LAMA (GLY) (triple therapy, high-dose ICS)
2) ICS (BUD 160 µg)+LABA (FOR)+LAMA (GLY) (triple therapy, low-dose ICS)
3) ICS (BUD 320 µg)+LABA (FOR)
4) LAMA (GLY)+LABA (FOR)8588 65 60% 167 cells per mm3 31% FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; CAT: COPD Assessment Test; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; FF: fluticasone furoate; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic antagonist; UMEC: umeclidinium; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist; VI: vilanterol; BUD: budesonide; GLY: glycopyrrolate; FOR: formoterol. #: exacerbation history in the past 12 months.
- TABLE 2
Main outcomes of the IMPACT and ETHOS trials
Study Primary outcome: rate of moderate/severe exacerbations per year Secondary/exploratory outcomes Mean SGRQ Lung function Mortality IMPACT • 0.91 with triple therapy Mean change from baseline in SGRQ: Mean change from baseline in FEV1: • 50 (1.2%) deaths in the FF/UMEC/VI arm • 1.07 with FF/VI (RR with triple therapy of 0.85 (95% CI 0.80–0.90); p<0.001) • −1.8 (−2.4 to −1.1; p <0.001) with triple therapy compared with FF/VI • +97 mL (85–109); p<0.001 with triple therapy compared with FF/VI • 49 (1.2%) in the FF/VI arm (no difference with FF/UMEC/VI) • 1.21 with UMEC/VI (RR with triple therapy of 0.75 (95% CI 0.70–0.81); p<0.001) • −1.8 (−2.6 to −1.0; p <0.001) with triple therapy compared with UMEC/VI • +54 mL (39–69); p<0.001 with triple therapy compared with UMEC/VI • 39 (1.9%) in the UMEC/VI arm (HR of 0.58 (95% CI 0.38–0.88), p=0.011, between FF/UMEC/VI and UMEC/VI) ETHOS • 1.08 with high-dose triple-therapy Mean change from baseline in SGRQ: Least square means change from baseline in FEV1: • 28 (1.3%) deaths in the high-dose triple therapy arm • 1.07 with low-dose triple-therapy • −1.88 (−2.84 to −0.91) with high-dose triple therapy compared with GLY/FOR • +35 mL (12–57); p=0.003 with triple therapy compared with GLY/FOR • 39 (1.8%) in the low-dose triple therapy arm (no difference with high-dose triple therapy arm) • 1.42 with GLY/FOR (RR with high-dose triple therapy of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.83); p<0.001) • −1.47 (−2.43 to −0.51) with high-dose triple therapy compared with BUD/FOR • +76 mL (54–99); p<0.0001 with triple therapy compared with GLY/FOR • 49 (2.3%) in the GLY/FOR arm (HR of 0.51 (95% CI 0.33–0.80), p=0.004, between triple therapy and GLY/FOR) • 1.24 with BUD/FOR (RR with high-dose triple therapy of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95); p=0.003) • 34 (1.6%) in the BUD/FOR arm (HR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.44–1.16), p=0.17, between triple therapy and BUD/FOR) SGRQ: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; RR: rate ratio; HR: hazard ratio; BUD: budesonide; GLY: glycopyrrolate; FOR: formoterol.