Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

When should we involve interventional radiology in the management of acute pulmonary embolism?

María Barca-Hernando, Luis Jara-Palomares
Breathe 2023 19: 230085; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0085-2023
María Barca-Hernando
1Respiratory Department, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for María Barca-Hernando
Luis Jara-Palomares
1Respiratory Department, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
2CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luis Jara-Palomares
  • For correspondence: luisoneumo@hotmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    a) Prognostic stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Information from [4]. b) Proposed algorithm for catheter-directed therapies (CDT) in high-risk and intermediate-high risk PE. Reproduced and modified from [13] with permission. PESI: pulmonary embolism severity index; sPESI: simplified pulmonary embolism severity index; RV: right ventricular; TTE: transthoracic echocardiogram; CTPA: computed tomography pulmonary angiography; UFH: unfractionated heparin; LMWH: low-molecular weight heparin; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant. GBP

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Summary of studies using catheter-directed therapies (CDT) in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE)

    Trial nameYearSample SizePopulationInterventionControlPrimary outcomeEfficacySafety
    Randomised controlled trials testing the efficacy and safety of different modes of catheter-directed thrombolysis
     ULTIMA [14]201459Intermediate–high riskUSAT, EkoSonic Endovascular System (10 mg per 15 h)Anticoagulation monotherapyChange in 24-h TTE-based RV/LV ratio.Mean RV/LV ratio was reduced 1.28 to 0.99 at 24 h (p<0.001) in USAT group versus 1.20 to 1.17 at 24 h (p=0.31) in heparin groupAt 90 days, there was one death (control), no major bleeding, four minor bleeding episodes (three in the USAT group and one in the heparin group; p=0.61)
     OPTALYSE  PE [16]2018100Intermediate riskUSAT, EkoSonic Endovascular System (4 mg per 2 h) (arm 1)USAT, EkoSonic System
    (4 mg per 4 h)  (arm 2)
    (6 mg per 6 h)  (arm 3)
    (12 mg per 6 h)  (arm 4)
    Change in the 48-h CT-based RV/LV ratioMean RV/LV diameter ratio:
    Arm 1: 0.40 (24.0%)
    Arm 2: 0.35 (22.6%)
    Arm 3: 0.42 (26.3%)
    Arm 4: 0.48 (25.5%)
    Major bleeding event rates:
    Arm 1: 0%
    Arm 2: 3.7%
    Arm 3: 3.6%
    Arm 4: 11.1%
     SUNSET-sPE [17]202181Intermediate risk (submassive)USAT, EkoSonic Endovascular System (8 mg per 8 h)cCDT, UniFuse (AngioDynamics) or
    Cragg-McNamara (Medtronic)
     (8 mg per 8 h)
    Change in the 48-h CT-based thrombus burdenNo significant difference in mean thrombus burden.
    Mean reduction in RV/LV  ratio (p=0.01):
     USAT: 0.37
     cCDT: 0.59
    Major bleeds: intervention four versus control zero
     CANARY [20]202294Intermediate-high riskcCDT, Cragg-McNamara (Medtronic) (12 mg per 24 h)Anticoagulation monotherapyProportion of patients with a TTE-based RV/LV ratio >0.9 at a 3-month follow-up4.3% in the cCDT group and 12.8% in the anticoagulation monotherapy group (p=0.24)
    Median RV/LV ratio at  3-month follow-up  (p=0.01):
     cCDT: 0.7
     Anticoagulation   monotherapy: 0.8
    One case of nonfatal major gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in the cCDT group
     HI-PEITHO  (NCT04790370)   [21]406Intermediate–high risk with additional criteria of severityUSAT, EkoSonic Endovascular System (9 mg per 7 h)Parenteral anticoagulation monotherapyComposite of PE-related mortality, PE recurrence or cardiorespiratory decompensation or collapse, within 7 days of randomisationOngoingOngoing
     BETULA  (NCT03854266)  [24]60Intermediate–high riskcCDT, Unifuse (AngioDynamics) (4 mg per 2 h)Unfractionated heparin monotherapyImprovement in RV/LV ratio at 24 hRecruitingRecruiting
     PE-TRACT  (NCT05591118)  [22]500Intermediate riskCDT consisting of mechanical thrombectomy or cCDTAnticoagulation monotherapyPeak oxygen consumption at a 3-month follow-upOngoingOngoing
    PEERLESS (NCT05111613) [25]550Intermediate–high risk without absolute contraindication of thrombolysisMechanical thrombectomy, FlowTriever SystemcCDT (any commercially available CDT system)Composite clinical end-point of all-cause mortality, ICH, major bleeding, clinical deterioration, ICU admission, and ICU length of stay during hospitalisationRecruitingRecruiting
     STORM-PE  (NCT05684796)  [26]100Intermediate–high riskMechanical aspiration, Indigo Aspiration SystemAnticoagulation monotherapyChange in the 48-h CT-based RV/LV ratioRecruitingRecruiting
     STRATIFY  (NCT04088292)  [27]210Intermediate–high riskUSAT (20 mg per 6 h)Anticoagulation monotherapyReduction in Miller score 48–96 h post-randomisationRecruitingRecruiting
     Peripheral  Systemic  Thrombolysis Versus Catheter  Directed  Thrombolysis  for Submassive PE (NCT03581877)  [28]202331Intermediate riskPeripheral low-dose thrombolysis (24 mg per 12 h)USAT, EkoSonic Endovascular System (24 mg per 12 h)Change in the 48-h TTE-based RV/LV ratioCompletedCompleted
    Registry of prospective studies testing the efficacy and safety of different modes of catheter-directed thrombolysis
     SEATTLE II [15]2015150Massive (n=31)
    Submassive  (n=119)
    USAT, EkoSonic Endovascular System (24 mg per 24 h)Change in the 48-h CT-based RV/LV ratioMean RV/LV ratio decreased from 1.55 to 1.13 at 48 h (p<0.0001).One GUSTO severe bleed; 16 GUSTO moderate bleed
     KNOCKOUT PE  Registry [29]20181480Intermediate–high risk or high riskUSAT, EkoSonic Endovascular SystemChange in 24–48 h TTE-based RV/LV ratio
    Persistence of pulmonary  hypertension
    OngoingOngoing
     PERFECT [30]2015101Massive (n=28)
    Submassive (n=73)
    Massive PE: catheter-directed mechanical or pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy
    Submassive PE: catheter-directed thrombolysis (UniFuse, EkoSonic or pig tail)
    Clinical success was defined as: stabilisation of haemodynamic, improvement in pulmonary hypertension and/or right heart strain, and survival to hospital dischargeClinical success:
    Massive PE: 85.7% (95% CI 67.3–96.0%)
    Submassive PE: 97.3% (95% CI 90.5–99.7%)
    No major haemorrhages and no haemorrhagic strokes
     FLARE [31]2019106Intermediate–high riskMechanical thrombectomy, FlowTriever System (Inari)Change in the 48-h CT-based RV/LV ratioMean RV/LV ratio 1.53 reduced to 1.15 at 48 hFour patients (3.8%) experienced six major adverse events
     EXTRACT-PE [32]2021119Submassive PEMechanical aspiration, IndigoVac (Penumbra)Change in the 48-h CT-based RV/LV ratioMean RV/LV ratio reduction was 0.43 (95% CI 0.38–0.47; p<0.0001) at 48 hTwo (1.7%) patients experienced three major adverse events
     FLAME [18]2023115High-risk PEMechanical thrombectomy, FlowTriever System (Inari)Context armComposite incidence of all-cause mortality, clinical deterioration, bailout, and major bleeding at 45 daysFlowTriever: 17%
    Context arm: 63.9%
     FLASH interim  results registry [33]2022250Intermediate–risk (n=233)
    High risk (n= 17)
    Mechanical thrombectomy, FlowTriever System (Inari)Composite of MAEs: device-related death, major bleeding, and intraprocedural device- or procedure-related adverse events at 48 hMAEs: three (1.2%), all of which were major bleeds that resolved without sequelae
    All-cause mortality was 0.4% at 30 days, with a single death that was unrelated to PE
     FLASH 6 months [34]2023799High risk (n=64)
    Intermediate–high risk  (n=616)
    Intermediate–low risk  or unclassified  (n=119)
    Mechanical thrombectomy, FlowTriever System (Inari)Evaluate RV function, MMRCD, 6MWT distances, and PE QoL scores at 6 monthsNormal RV function increased from 15.1% to 95.1% (p<0.0001)
    MMRCD score improved from 3.0 to 0.0 (p<0.0001)
    6MWT distances  increased from 180 m  to 398 m (p <0.001)
    Prevalence of site-reported chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension was 1.0% and chronic thromboembolic disease was 1.9%
     FLASH full  cohort [19]2023800High risk (n=63)
    Intermediate–high risk  (n=614)
    Mechanical thrombectomy, FlowTriever System (Inari)Composite of MAE: device-related death, major bleeding, device- or procedure-related adverse eventsMAEs: 1.8%
    All-cause mortality was  0.3% at 48-h follow-up  and 0.8% at 30-day  follow-up, with no  device-related deaths

    RV: right ventricular; LV: left ventricular; TTE: transthoracic echocardiogram; CT: computed tomography; cCDT: combined catheter-directed treatment (fibrinolysis and thrombectomy); GUSTO: Global Use of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries; ICH: intracerebral haemorrhage; ICU: intensive care unit; MAE: major adverse events; MMRCD: modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scores; 6MWT: 6-min walk test; QoL: quality of life.

    Previous
    Back to top
    Vol 19 Issue 3 Table of Contents
    Breathe: 19 (3)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    When should we involve interventional radiology in the management of acute pulmonary embolism?
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    When should we involve interventional radiology in the management of acute pulmonary embolism?
    María Barca-Hernando, Luis Jara-Palomares
    Breathe Sep 2023, 19 (3) 230085; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0085-2023

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    When should we involve interventional radiology in the management of acute pulmonary embolism?
    María Barca-Hernando, Luis Jara-Palomares
    Breathe Sep 2023, 19 (3) 230085; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0085-2023
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Tweetable abstract
      • Introduction
      • PE therapy
      • Ongoing trials to evaluate CDT in PE
      • Current role for CDT in PE
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Oxygen in interstitial lung diseases
    • How to increase NIV effectiveness in bulbar ALS patients
    Show more Ask the expert

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About Breathe

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Intructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN: 1810-6838
    Online ISSN: 2073-4735

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society