Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

The clinical usefulness of spirometric information

P.M.A. Calverley
Breathe 2009 5: 214-220; DOI:
P.M.A. Calverley
Clinical Science Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pmacal@liverpool.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary Spirometry is a remarkably versatile and informative measurement with known between-test reproducibility. It can be used reliably by a range of practitioners and technologists and changes in spirometry indicate important changes in the patient's clinical condition, although the significance of a given change has to be calibrated against the disease context in which it occurs. Community-based spirometry can identify a range of diseases and exclude others while promoting significant changes in treatment.

Spirometry is a key part of bronchial challenge testing, which can be said to diagnose and monitor progress in asthma. Reductions in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) are prognostically relevant in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as are decreases in vital capacity in neuromuscular disease. Determining disease progression as the rate of decline in FEV1 is not practical at an individual patient level, but documenting the loss of lung function over time is still a valuable outcome to monitor. Used together with other clinical features, spirometry can substantially improve our assessment of the patient and their long-term management [1].

  • ©ERS 2009
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 5 Issue 3 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The clinical usefulness of spirometric information
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The clinical usefulness of spirometric information
P.M.A. Calverley
Breathe Mar 2009, 5 (3) 214-220;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The clinical usefulness of spirometric information
P.M.A. Calverley
Breathe Mar 2009, 5 (3) 214-220;
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • A clinicians’ review of the respiratory microbiome
  • The problems of cohort studies
  • Breathing exercises for asthma
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About Breathe

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Intructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 1810-6838
Online ISSN: 2073-4735

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society