Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Spirometry in clinical use: practical issues

M. Agnew
Breathe 2010 6: 196-203; DOI: 10.1183/18106838.0603.196
M. Agnew
St James's Hospital - Respiratory, Laboratory, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: magnew@stjames.ie
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Educational aims

  1. To identify practical problems when carrying out spirometry.

  2. To provide a short ‘pathway’ to assess spirometry results.

  3. To provide a standard operational procedure to carry out spirometry from current guidelines.

Summary ‘Spirometry is a simple test of lung function’. How often have we heard that statement? Does this come to mind when trying to get an 80-yr-old, ill, somewhat confused patient to follow instructions and perform an acceptable, reproducible test in our department? NO. Of course, there is more to spirometry than the patient being able to follow instructions, but that is another issue. Let's start with the basics. Three things impact on good test results: 1) the operator (be it a technician, scientist, nurse, physiotherapist or doctor); 2) the equipment (in this case a spirometer (desktop or handheld) or hospital department lung function equipment); and 3) the patient (who can be young, interested and co-operative, or elderly, ill and non-cooperative, or somewhere in between). All three can impact in a positive or negative way on your test results; therefore, it is important to optimise the working of each one to rule out problems.

  • ERS
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 3 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spirometry in clinical use: practical issues
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Spirometry in clinical use: practical issues
M. Agnew
Breathe Mar 2010, 6 (3) 196-203; DOI: 10.1183/18106838.0603.196

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Spirometry in clinical use: practical issues
M. Agnew
Breathe Mar 2010, 6 (3) 196-203; DOI: 10.1183/18106838.0603.196
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • A clinicians’ review of the respiratory microbiome
  • The problems of cohort studies
  • Breathing exercises for asthma
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About Breathe

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Intructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 1810-6838
Online ISSN: 2073-4735

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society