Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Journal club
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Basic science: Epigenetic programming and the respiratory system

Andrew L. Durham, Ian M. Adcock
Breathe 2013 9: 278-288; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.000413
Andrew L. Durham
Airways Disease Section, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.durham@imperial.ac.uk
Ian M. Adcock
Airways Disease Section, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary The coordinated regulation of gene expression is crucial for survival, especially in multi-cellular organisms. Gene regulation can occur through a number of different mechanisms, which include the binding of transcription factors to gene promoters and enhancers and to gene repressors.

Overlaid upon this is the epigenetic (or “above” genetics) regulation of gene expression. Epigenetics has been implicated in the determination of cell differentiation and the control of gene expression by each cell under different external stimuli. Epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, which is principally involved in gene silencing, and plays a key role in maintaining cellular differentiation. Another layer of epigenetic regulation is DNA packaging into chromatin, which can alter the availability of the DNA, and is controlled by histone modifications. Finally non-coding RNAs can also affect the stability of coding mRNA and its ability to interact with ribosomes and be translated into protein.

These epigenetic mechanisms are heritable, and maintained through multiple cell divisions, helping to control cell fate, and can even be passed onto germ cells and future generations. In addition to inheritance epigenetics can be altered by the environment, and factors such as pollution and cigarette smoking have been shown to alter the epigenetic profile of cells.

The role of epigenetics in controlling gene expression in complex organs, such as the lungs, is a promising area of research and may help to explain complex inheritance patterns and environmental interactions of many lung diseases including asthma, COPD and lung cancer.

Introduction

The last decade saw the genetic age come to fruition with very large genome-wide association studies of many complex diseases including some respiratory diseases [1]. Although these studies provided new unforeseen targets which implicate novel pathways or proteins in asthma, lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for example, they did not account for all the heritability of disease. This has led to the search for factors that may be involved in this “missing heritability”. Confounding this is the fact that all of the myriad cell types within the lung have the same DNA sequence yet they express distinct patterns of genes and proteins and perform distinct functions. Again, it is clear that some factors control this differential expression and response to external cell stimulation. One process that has been implicated in both these effects is epigenetics, from the Greek for “above genetics” [2, 3]. There has been an explosion of papers reporting epigenetic changes which occur in a number of diseases including chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer; indeed the next decade may become the epigenetic age.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is commonly viewed as the blueprint of a cell, encoding all the information required for life within its genes. The information encoded in the DNA is transcribed by the ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerase enzymes into messenger (m)RNA in the nucleus, and is transported to the endoplasmic reticulum where the information is translated into amino acids by the ribosomes (fig. 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Central dogma of mRNA. The information encoded in genes in the DNA is transcribed and copied to single stranded RNA by RNA polymerase. This process is modulated by transcription factors, which can act as enhancers and repressors of transcription. The information in messenger (m)RNA is subsequently translated into protein by the ribosomes, which use the mRNA as a template to form polypeptide chains of amino acids.

Owing to the complexity of living organisms the expression of genes is tightly controlled, and whilst the genome of each cell contains the information for all proteins in the human body, only a select subset are expressed at any time in any particular cell type. Therefore the processes of transcription and translation are both tightly regulated to ensure that only the correct proteins are expressed, by a number of mechanisms including transcription factors, transcriptional repressor and transcriptional activator proteins.

The ability of the transcription factors to bind to DNA can be controlled by limiting their access to the DNA. Changes to the way in which DNA is packaged into the cell's nucleus, or alteration of markers on the DNA, such as the addition of methyl groups to a cytosine (5′-methyl C) residue, can drastically alter the ability of the transcription factors to bind to the DNA or the recruitment of transcriptional repressor complexes.

Even after transcription the process of mRNA translocation and translation into protein is tightly controlled by a number of processes, including mRNA stability and binding of other non-coding RNAs to the mRNA.

These mechanisms of transcriptional control are termed epigenetics, and although they do not change the DNA sequence, can be inherited, both by daughter cells after mitosis and even by gametes after meiosis.

DNA methylation

DNA methylation was the first epigenetic mechanism described. DNA methylation, although originally thought to be irreversible, is now known to be a reversible modification of DNA resulting from the enzymatic addition of a methyl group to predominantly cytosine nucleic acids. In most cases, these C residues are followed by a guanine forming a CpG motif. These methylated CpG motifs often exist in groups or CpG islands [4] and generally result in gene silencing. However, there are exceptions to this general rule [5]. These DNA methylation patterns are characteristic of cell types and specific patterns of DNA methylation may remain relatively static throughout a cell's lifespan, following differentiation.

DNA methylation plays a key role in lung development

The lungs begin to develop four weeks after conception and continue to develop after birth. The pluripotent embryonic cells, which are capable of developing into all the cell types in the body, differentiate into specific cell lineages. As the cells develop into more specialised cell types, the cells pick up epigenetic markers on DNA and on histones that lock the cells into their particular lineage [6]. Thus, DNA methylation that a key part of cellular differentiation and development and animals that lose the ability to methylate the DNA fail to develop into adulthood [4].

DNA methylation is important for the immune response

The role of DNA methylation in the immune response is especially important in the regulation of the major histo-compatability (MHC) genes which are involved in antigen presentation [7] and regulation of the innate and adaptive immune systems [8]. The region encoding the MHC on chromosome 6 has been implicated in asthma in several genome-wide searches [9] and epigenetic regulation of the region has been found, highlighting the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in the development of inflammatory diseases [8, 10]. Studies are now being undertaken to examine the levels of DNA methylation in stored blood cells in order to gain greater insight into gene–environment regulation of gene expression in asthma and COPD.

DNA methylation plays a key role in lung cancer

Owing to its role in gene silencing and determining cell fate, DNA methylation is an important factor in the development of cancer. Hypomethylation (the loss of methylation) of the genome is found in cancer [11] and is thought to have significant implications on gene activation, loss of heterozygosity, and global chromosomal stability [12–14].

Aberrant DNA methylation is also associated with cancer development [11]. Increased DNA methylation of a gene promoter region causes gene silencing and hypermethylation of tumour suppressor gene promoters is thought to contribute to the complex processes leading to increased cell proliferation in lung cancer [15, 16]. Studies have shown that the majority of lung cancers have hypermethylated gene promoters and more than 80 genes have been reported to be hypermethylated in lung cancer [17]. In contrast to gene mutation, promoter hypermethylation is a reversible process, making it a very attractive target for cancer therapy; and it is hoped that further study into DNA methylation patterns in cancer may yield potential biomarkers for the early detection of the disease [18].

Alterations to DNA methylation are also associated with the development of COPD, including hypomethylation of immune-modulatory genes [19]. For example, the CpGs in the vicinity of the SERPINA1 gene coding for α1-antitrypsin, a serine protease inhibitor, the loss of which is associated with early onset emphysema, have been shown to be hypomethylated in COPD patients, [2]. In this case, the effect of DNA hypomethylation at these CpGs on SERPINA1 expression is unclear.

DNA packaging

The double helix structure of DNA in humans contains nearly 3 billion base pairs (bp) [20] and if the DNA in a single human cell was stretched out it would reach a length of nearly 2 metres [20]. If all the DNA in an average adult human was stretched out end to end it would reach for 100 trillion metres, approximately 300 times the return journey to the Sun or 2.5 million times around the Earth's equator [20].

In order to contain this amount of DNA within the nucleus of a cell it is tightly packaged, most notably into 23 pairs of chromosomes. These chromosomes are only present during cell division, and in the normal, resting cell state the DNA is wound into a less condensed structure, known as chromatin (fig. 2).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

DNA packaging diagram. The structure of DNA packaging.

Chromatin is itself made of a complex mix of DNA and scaffolding proteins, in repeating structures termed “nucleosomes”. These nucleosomes are formed of ∼150 bp of DNA, tightly wrapped around a protein core, which is made of eight histone proteins [21–23]. The nucleosomes are joined together by a short linker section of DNA, 20 bp in length producing a structure which, viewed under an electron microscope, appears as “beads on a string”.

Chromatin is further condensed to help its packaging into the nucleus. The nucleosomes are coiled into a more tightly wound structures, such as the 30 nm fibre (named owing to its width), which are further condensed into more compact structures (fig. 2), until the DNA ultimately is condensed into the chromosomes during mitosis.

In order for transcription to occur, proteins such as RNA polymerase need to bind to the DNA and the DNA strands need to be separated. While these higher-order structures in chromatin are very good for packaging the DNA they prevent the transcriptional machinery from accessing DNA. Therefore, the packaging of DNA needs to be removed and the DNA unwound in order for transcription to occur. The accessibility of the DNA is controlled by the histone cores, which can be dislocated by DNA remodelling proteins; or the histones themselves may be modified, such as by acetylation, methylation or phosphorylation. Importantly these processes of histone modification are fully reversible as they are controlled by distinct sets of enzymes that can either add the relevant tag or remove them. As such, chromatin is in a dynamic state, with the DNA being remodelled between the compact and relaxed states as required depending upon the cellular environment in a temporal manner.

Histone modifications

Histones are small, positively charged molecules, which helps them to interact with the negatively charged DNA backbone [20]. There are five distinct, highly evolutionarily conserved histone molecules, histone H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 [21]. Histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 (2 of each) form the octamer histone core of the nucleosome around which DNA is coiled. Importantly, the N-terminal tails of these histones protrude through and beyond the DNA backbone which make them accessible for post-translational modifications.

The histone H1 molecule helps form higher structures of chromatin and has been shown to be crucial for the formation of the 30-nm fibre structures. The modifications to histones that affect transcription are illustrated in figure 3.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Histone modifications alter DNA accessibility. DNA in the condensed heterochromatin state is tightly wound around the histone core. The tight coiling prevents other DNA binding proteins, such as RNA polymerase or transcription factors, from accessing the DNA. In the euchromatin state the histones are less closely associated with DNA and transcription is able to occur. The change between euchromatin and heterochromatin is a dynamic process regulated by modifications to the histone proteins. These modifications include acetylation, methylation and phosphorylation. TF: transcription factor; RNA pol: RNA polymerase.

The histones can be post-translationally modified by families of enzymes which are generally selective for adding, or removing, these modifications. The addition of acetyl, methyl and phosphate groups can alter the affinity of the histones for DNA. The addition of these modifications or tags alters the charge on the histone tails and thereby alters the binding of the histones to the DNA. Furthermore, these histone tags may also serve to recruit co-factors to the DNA. The ability of these co-factors to bind ultimately affects the transcriptional state of the chromatin, and is termed the histone code or language [24, 25].

Histone acetylation

Histone acetylation is the most widely studied modification. Acetylation occurs on lysine residues and a number of these are present on the N-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 that extend beyond the DNA loops. Acetylated histones lose their positive charge and interact less strongly with DNA [26], which results in a more relaxed or open chromatin state, termed euchromatin [26], which is associated with transcription. The acetylation of the histones is carried out by enzymes called histone acetyl transferases (HATs). There are ∼25 enzymes with HAT activity that are grouped on the basis of their catalytic domains [27]. Conversely these acetyl marks can be removed by another group of 18 enzymes termed histone deacetylases (HDACs), which leads to the chromatin returning to the more condensed heterochromatin state [26, 28]. Acetylation tags are recognised by proteins that contain a particular sequence known as a bromodomain [29, 30]. Recently, drugs selective for groups of bromodomain-containing proteins have been developed and these have been reported to be very effective in suppressing cytokine release from macrophages and preventing death in animal models of sepsis [31] and the development of cancer [32] whether delivered prophylactically or therapeutically.

Other histone modifications

Other histone modifications, including methylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination of the histones are less well understood [33]. These alterations to the histone code are also important for the regulation of transcription, either through altering the association between histones and DNA or through the recruitment of other transcriptional co-factors. Whilst less is known about these histone modifications and their role in disease, there is evidence of high turnover of these marks on the histones indicating they are a highly active and involved process. At present it is not known precisely how these different histone modifications act together in a temporal manner to co-ordinate gene expression [24]. However, as new tools become available, it is likely that this aspect of the histone code will be better understood and the role of these modifications in disease will be elucidated.

Role of histone modifications in lung diseases

Within the lungs, the dynamic nature of the chromatin plays an important role in regulating inflammation in asthma and COPD [34]. Histone acetylation is associated with the expression of numerous pro-inflammatory genes, in a variety of cell types, including inflammatory cells, the lung epithelium and the airway smooth muscle (ASM) [34]. For example ASM stimulated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α shows histone H4 acetylation of the eotaxin gene promoter, along with binding of the transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-κB and eotaxin production [35].

In contrast, the activity of corticosteroids, used to treat a number of ailments including asthma and COPD, is closely associated with HDAC2 activity. Glucocorticoids are recognised by the glucocorticoid receptor which, when activated, translocates to the nucleus. Within the nucleus, activated glucocorticoid receptor, among other actions, binds to the promoters of specific sets of inflammatory genes, recruits repressor complexes that contain HDAC2 and represses their transcription [36]. The presence of HDAC2 at the site of inflammatory gene transcription removes local acetyl tags and results in a more closed or condensed heterochromatin state preventing further transcription.

Defects in this mechanism may help to explain the glucocorticoid insensitivity seen in severe asthmatics and patients with COPD. Several studies have linked reduced HDAC2 activity to chronic inflammation in the lungs [37, 38] and as such this makes restoring HDAC function in these patients of potential value as a future treatment [39].

In addition to the control of lung inflammation, histone modifications are also associated with the correct expression of genes involved in cellular replication [40, 41] and DNA repair [42]. Importantly, errors in DNA replication or inappropriate cell division are important factors in driving cancers, including lung cancer.

Histone acetylation appears to play a dual role in lung cancer, both suppressing and driving cancers depending on the genes targeted [43]. Inappropriate histone acetylation, leading to the silencing, of tumour suppressor genes has been found in lung cancer [44]. In contrast, inhibition of HDAC activity inhibits tumour growth, reactivates tumour suppressor genes, and leads to genomic instability by a variety of mechanisms [45]. Although the mechanism of action of HDAC inhibitors in this context is not yet fully understood, they may act through effects on non-histone proteins [46].

Histone methylation is also considered to be an essential step involved in many cell fate determination [45], developmental and differentiation processes [47–49], pluripotency [50] and maintaining genome integrity [51]. It is no surprise, therefore, that histone methylation under the control of several histone methyltransferase (HMT) families has been linked to cell proliferation in models of lung cancer [52]. Indeed, almost 50% of HMTs are associated with tumorigenesis [45]. In the same way that histone acetylation is reversed by groups of deacetylases, histone methylation is reversed by families of histone demethylases (HDMs) [53]. The effects of histone methylation are more complex than that of acetylation as some methylation tags (H3K4 for example) are associated with active gene expression whilst others such as H3K27 are associated with gene repression. Methylation can occur on the same lysine residues as acetylation and competition can occur between HATs and HMTs for targeting specific residues [54].

Non-coding RNAs

The DNA encoding proteins is only a tiny fraction of the total length of the human genome [55]. Human genes contain coding regions termed exons (normally short and containing an average of 50 codons (150 bp) [55]) separated by long stretches on non-coding introns (up to 10 kbp in length) [55]. In addition the human genome contains thousands of non-coding genes, that when transcribed into RNA, do not result in the production of a protein product. When the human genome was first sequenced it was estimated to contain ∼50 000 protein encoding genes [55], however now this number has been revised down to only 20 000–25 000 [56]. Many genes are not protein-encoding but are transcribed into non-coding RNAs (ncRNA). These can perform a number of important functions, including acting as transfer and ribosomal RNAs, which help translate the mRNA sequence in polypeptides, and small nuclear RNAs, which are crucial for splicing and the removal of the introns from the mRNA sequence [55].

More recently ncRNAs have been shown to play a role in the regulation of cells. Non-coding RNAs include microRNAs (miRNA), which are small non-coding, single stranded RNA molecules of 19–25 nucleotides in length [57], as well as longer 200 bp long-non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) of which about 11 000 exist (www.lncipedia.org). MicroRNAs are capable of binding to full-length mRNA sequences and altering transcription. As miRNAs are capable of binding to multiple mRNAs, the effect of inducing or repressing miRNA expression can influence most biological processes, including cell fate specification, cell proliferation, DNA repair, DNA methylation and apoptosis, and can provide pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory stimuli. Importantly for the development of both lung cancer and COPD, miRNAs play an essential role in the development of both the adaptive and innate immune systems [58]. In contrast, lncRNAs can modulate gene expression by guiding transcription factors to binding sites on DNA or by controlling the compaction of local chromatin [59].

The interactions of miRNAs, lncRNAs and mRNAs and their role in disease is not yet fully understood; however, recent work indicates that they are important in both COPD and lung cancer and are potential biomarkers of disease [60]. Several miRNAs are linked to inflammation, proliferation, heart disease and cancer [57]. Some are also down-regulated in the skeletal muscle of patients with COPD compared with non-smoking controls and their expression correlated with clinical features [61].

Non-coding RNAs including miRNAs have been shown to play important roles in lung development [62] and due to their role in cell fate and development miRNAs and lncRNAs probably also play a causal role in cancer [63].

Environmental factors alter the epigenetic profile

As epigenetic processes are dynamic they can be changed throughout a person's lifetime. Environmental factors, such as pollution, diet and cigarette smoking have all been linked to epigenetic modifications [34]. The ability of the environment to alter gene expression through epigenetics may help to explain the complex genetic and environmental interactions in disease, which is especially important in the lung owing to its function as the air–body interface.

Diet can have a major impact on the epigenetic profile, which is best illustrated by the heritable phenotype of transgenic agouti mice, named after their mottled yellow coat colour. Genetically identical mice whose mothers were fed different diets were born with different coat colours. Offspring of mothers fed a folic acid supplemented diet were more likely to have a normal (darker) coat colour, a marker for improved health. The coat colour effect was mediated via increased methylation of the CpG island upstream of the agouti gene (fig. 4) [64]. In a similar manner, supplementation of the maternal diet with folic acid altered the methylation status and gene expression levels in an allergic model of airway hyperresponsiveness in mice [65].

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Genetically identical agouti mice. Agouti mice, which are genetically identical, show different coat patterns due to altered maternal diet. The diet alters the methylation of the agouti gene, changing its expression.

Exposure to air pollution has long been associated with lung diseases [66, 67]. Air pollution, for instance from traffic or industry, can be inhaled deeply into the airways, and pollution has been consistently associated with a variety of adverse health outcomes [68]. As well as causing direct damage to the airways, air pollution has been linked to epigenetic changes in the lung. For example, cigarette smoking and air pollution can result in oxidative stress, leading to DNA lesions and hypomethylation [69–71]. An example, of how epigenetic changes may affect autoimmune disease susceptibility is seen in twin studies. For example, the risk of lupus increases in monozygotic twins, and this has been associated with greater changes in DNA methylation status at particular sites linked to disease-associated genes, presumably as a result of exposure to greater environmental stresses [72].

Cigarette smoke is associated with both lung cancer and COPD. As previously discussed, reduction in HDAC activity is associated with the chronic inflammation seen in COPD. It has been shown that exposure to cigarette smoke reduces the expression and activity of HDAC2 both at the protein and mRNA level [73, 74].

There is a large body of evidence that prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is associated with impaired respiratory function and increased risk of transient wheeze or asthma [75–77]. Maternal smoking in the last trimester is correlated with asthma by 1 year of age and is possibly associated with changes in global and gene-specific DNA methylation patterns [78]. Furthermore, ETS has also been linked to the development of adult asthma [79]. Smoking is thought to alter DNA methylation through a process of oxidative stress [69].

Conclusion

Changes to DNA accessibility, through modification of the histones or DNA methylation, or the involvement of non-coding RNAs can dramatically alter the gene expression and translation profile of a cell. The changes to protein expression can have large impacts on cellular function, leading to inflammation in chronic diseases such as asthma and COPD or inappropriate cell division as in lung cancer. The epigenetic regulation of a cell is therefore of great importance as a field of research.

The epigenetic programming of a cell is a dynamic process, under the control of distinct sets of enzymes, which can be modified by environmental factors. New drugs that target these modifications are under development for many cancers. Future studies will also determine whether the beneficial effects seen in acute models of inflammation will be translated to chronic inflammatory diseases. Of interest, several drugs, particularly nuclear hormone receptors such as corticosteroids, utilize epigenetic changes to obtain their full clinical benefit. Understanding how epigenetics affects lung disease will be of interest as it also provides the potential to cure chronic diseases by resetting the epigenome that has been perturbed by disease or by the environment.

Footnotes

  • Statement of Interest

    A.L. Durham’s salary is supported by a grant from Pfizer. I.M. Adcock is an advisory board member for Almirall, Chiesi, GSK and Novartis. He has received research grants from UBIOPRED and the Medical Research Council and has received payment for lectures, meetings and educational activities from MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK.

  • Support statement

    This manuscript was supported by a Wellcome Trust programme grant on epigenetics in COPD.

  • ©ERS 2013

References

  1. ↵
    1. Binia A,
    2. Kabesch M
    . Respiratory medicine - genetic base for allergy and asthma. Swiss Med Wkly 2012; 142 .
  2. ↵
    1. Kabesch M,
    2. Adcock IM
    . Epigenetics in asthma and COPD. Biochimie 2012; 94: 2231–2241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Durham A,
    2. Chou P-C,
    3. Kirkham P,
    4. et al
    . Epigenetics in asthma and other inflammatory lung diseases. Epigenomics 2010; 2: 523–537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Rutledge CE,
    2. Lees-Murdock DJ,
    3. Walsh CP
    . DNA methylation in development. In: eLS New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  5. ↵
    1. Guilleret I,
    2. Yan P,
    3. Grange F,
    4. et al
    . Hypermethylation of the human telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) gene correlates with telomerase activity. Int J Cancer 2002; 101: 335–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Iglesias-Bartolome R,
    2. Callejas-Valera JL,
    3. Gutkind JS
    . Control of the epithelial stem cell epigenome: the shaping of epithelial stem cell identity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013; 25: 162–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. van den Elsen PJ,
    2. Holling TM,
    3. van der Stoep N,
    4. et al
    . DNA methylation and expression of major histocompatibility complex class I and class II transactivator genes in human developmental tumor cells and in T cell malignancies. Clin Immunol 2003; 109: 46–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Rakyan VK,
    2. Hildmann T,
    3. Novik KL,
    4. et al
    . DNA Methylation Profiling of the Human Major Histocompatibility Complex: A Pilot Study for the Human Epigenome Project. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: e405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Moffatt MF,
    2. Schou C,
    3. Faux JA,
    4. et al
    . Association between quantitative traits underlying asthma and the HLA-DRB1 locus in a family-based population sample. Eur J Hum Genet 2001; 9: 341–346.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. S Suárez-Alvarez B,
    2. Rodriguez RM,
    3. Calvanese V,
    4. et al
    . Epigenetic mechanisms regulate MHC and antigen processing molecules in human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hammoud SS,
    2. Cairns BR,
    3. Jones DA
    . Epigenetic regulation of colon cancer and intestinal stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013; 25: 177–183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yeh A,
    2. Wei M,
    3. Golub SB,
    4. et al
    . Chromosome arm 16q in Wilms tumors: Unbalanced chromosomal translocations, loss of heterozygosity, and assessment of the CTCF gene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2002; 35: 156–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Eden A,
    2. Gaudet F,
    3. Waghmare A,
    4. et al
    . Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation. Science 2003; 300: 455.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Suter CM,
    2. Martin DI,
    3. Ward RL
    . Hypomethylation of L1 retrotransposons in colorectal cancer and adjacent normal tissue. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19: 95–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Liloglou T,
    2. Bediaga NG,
    3. Brown BR,
    4. et al
    . Epigenetic biomarkers in lung cancer. Cancer Lett 2012 [In press: DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.018].
  15. ↵
    1. Das PM,
    2. Singal R
    . DNA Methylation and Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4632–4642.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Sato M,
    2. Shames DS,
    3. Gazdar AF,
    4. et al
    . A translational view of the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2: 327–343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Fukushige S,
    2. Horii A
    . DNA methylation in cancer: a gene silencing mechanism and the clinical potential of its biomarkers. Tohoku J Exp Med 2013; 229: 173–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Qiu W,
    2. Baccarelli A,
    3. Carey VJ,
    4. et al
    . Variable DNA methylation is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185: 373–381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Annunziato A
    . DNA packaging: nucleosomes and chromatin. Nature Education 2008; 1
  20. ↵
    1. Zlatanova J,
    2. Bishop TC,
    3. Victor JM,
    4. et al
    . The nucleosome family: dynamic and growing. Structure 2009; 17: 160–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. van Holde K E
    , ed. Chromatin: Springer Series in Molecular Biology. New York, Springer Verlag, 1988.
  21. ↵
    1. Bönisch C,
    2. Hake SB
    . Histone H2A variants in nucleosomes and chromatin: more or less stable? Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 10719–10741.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Labrador M,
    2. Corces VG
    . Phosphorylation of histone H3 during transcriptional activation depends on promoter structure. Genes Dev 2003; 17: 43–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Jenuwein T,
    2. Allis CD
    . Translating the histone code. Science 2001; 293: 1074–1080.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Eberharter A,
    2. Becker PB
    . Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. EMBO Rep 2002; 3: 224–229.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Marmorstein R
    . Structure of histone acetyltransferases. J Mol Biol 2001; 311: 433–444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Khochbin S,
    2. Verdel A,
    3. Lemercier C,
    4. et al
    . Functional significance of histone deacetylase diversity. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: 162–166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Haynes SR,
    2. Dollard C,
    3. Winston F,
    4. et al
    . The bromodomain: a conserved sequence found in human, Drosophila and yeast proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1992; 20: 2603.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Filippakopoulos P,
    2. Knapp S
    . The bromodomain interaction module. FEBS Lett 2012; 586: 2692–2704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Nicodeme E,
    2. Jeffrey KL,
    3. Schaefer U,
    4. et al
    . Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic. Nature 2010; 468: 1119–1123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Filippakopoulos P,
    2. Qi J,
    3. Picaud S,
    4. et al
    . Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature 2010; 468: 1067–1073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Bannister AJ,
    2. Kouzarides T
    . Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 2011; 21: 381–395.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Adcock IM,
    2. Ford P,
    3. Ito K,
    4. et al
    . Epigenetics and airways disease. Respir Res 2006; 7: 21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Nie M,
    2. Knox AJ,
    3. Pang L
    . β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists, Like Glucocorticoids, Repress Eotaxin Gene Transcription by Selective Inhibition of Histone H4 Acetylation. J Immunol 2005; 175: 478–486.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Barnes PJ
    . How corticosteroids control inflammation: Quintiles Prize Lecture 2005. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 148: 245–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Barnes PJ
    . Role of HDAC2 in the Pathophysiology of COPD. Annu Rev Physiol 2009; 71: 451–464.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Barnes PJ,
    2. Adcock IM
    . Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory diseases. Lancet 2009; 373: 1905–1917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Adcock IM,
    2. Chou PC,
    3. Durham A,
    4. et al
    . Overcoming steroid unresponsiveness in airways disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37: 824–829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Nowak SJ,
    2. Corces VG
    . Phosphorylation of histone H3: a balancing act between chromosome condensation and transcriptional activation. Trends Genet 2004; 20: 214–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Mahadevan LC,
    2. Willis AC,
    3. Barratt MJ
    . Rapid histone H3 phosphorylation in response to growth factors, phorbol esters, okadaic acid, and protein synthesis inhibitors. Cell 1991; 65: 775–783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Shroff R,
    2. Arbel-Eden A,
    3. Pilch D,
    4. et al
    . Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined dna double-strand break. Curr Biol. 2004; 14: 1703–1711.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Di Cerbo V,
    2. Schneider R
    . Cancers with wrong HATs: the impact of acetylation. Brief Funct Genomics 2013 [In press: DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/els065].
  42. ↵
    1. Tani M,
    2. Ito J,
    3. Nishioka M,
    4. et al
    . Correlation between histone acetylation and expression of the MYO18B gene in human lung cancer cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004; 40: 146–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Cohen I,
    2. Poręba E,
    3. Kamieniarz K,
    4. et al
    . Histone modifiers in cancer. Friends or foes? Genes Cancer 2011; 2: 631–647.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Marks PA
    . Discovery and development of SAHA as an anticancer agent. Oncogene 2007; 26: 1351–1356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Pasini D,
    2. Bracken AP,
    3. Hansen JB,
    4. et al
    . The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 3769–3779.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pasini D,
    2. Bracken AP,
    3. Jensen MR,
    4. et al
    . Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity. EMBO J 2004; 23: 4061–4071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Kimura M,
    2. Koseki Y,
    3. Yamashita M,
    4. et al
    . Regulation of Th2 cell differentiation by mel-18, a mammalian polycomb group gene. Immunity 2001; 15: 275–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Torres-Padilla ME,
    2. Parfitt DE,
    3. Kouzarides T,
    4. et al
    . Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo. Nature 2007; 445: 214–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Schotta G,
    2. Sengupta R,
    3. Kubicek S,
    4. et al
    . A chromatin-wide transition to H4K20 monomethylation impairs genome integrity and programmed DNA rearrangements in the mouse. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 2048–2061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Kim W,
    2. Kim R,
    3. Park G,
    4. et al
    . The deficiency of H3K79 histone methyltransferase DOT1L inhibits cell proliferation. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 5588–5599.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Kouzarides T
    . Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007; 128: 693–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Yun M,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Workman JL,
    4. et al
    . Readers of histone modifications. Cell Res 2011; 21: 564–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Baltimore D
    . Our genome unveiled. Nature 2001; 409: 814–816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Wu S,
    2. Li N,
    3. Ma J,
    4. et al
    . First proteomic exploration of protein-encoding genes on chromosome 1 in human liver, stomach, and colon. J Proteome Res 2013; 12: 67–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Esteller M
    . Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12: 861–874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Lu L-F,
    2. Liston A
    . MicroRNA in the immune system, microRNA as an immune system. Immunology 2009; 127: 291–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Wang KC,
    2. Yang YW,
    3. Liu B,
    4. et al
    . A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature 2011; 472: 120–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Leidinger P,
    2. Keller A,
    3. Borries A,
    4. et al
    . Specific peripheral miRNA profiles for distinguishing lung cancer from COPD. Lung Cancer 2011; 74: 41–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Lewis A,
    2. Riddoch-Contreras J,
    3. Natanek SA,
    4. et al
    . Downregulation of the serum response factor/miR-1 axis in the quadriceps of patients with COPD. Thorax 2012; 67: 26–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Williams AE,
    2. Moschos SA,
    3. Perry MM,
    4. et al
    . Maternally imprinted microRNAs are differentially expressed during mouse and human lung development. Dev Dyn 2007; 236: 572–580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Schetter AJ,
    2. Heegaard NH,
    3. Harris CC
    . Inflammation and cancer: interweaving microRNA, free radical, cytokine and p53 pathways. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31: 37–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Cooney CA,
    2. Dave AA,
    3. Wolff GL
    . Maternal methyl supplements in mice affect epigenetic variation and DNA methylation of offspring. J Nutr 2002; 132: 2393S–2400S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Hollingsworth JW,
    2. Maruoka S,
    3. Boon K,
    4. et al
    . In utero supplementation with methyl donors enhances allergic airway disease in mice. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3462–3469.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Escamilla-Nuñez MC,
    2. Barraza-Villarreal A,
    3. Hernandez-Cadena L,
    4. et al
    . Traffic-related air pollution and respiratory symptoms among asthmatic children, resident in Mexico City: the EVA cohort study. Respir Res 2008; 9: 74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. McCreanor J,
    2. Cullinan P,
    3. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ,
    4. et al
    . Respiratory effects of exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2348–2358.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Baccarelli A,
    2. Wright RO,
    3. Bollati V,
    4. et al
    . Rapid DNA methylation changes after exposure to traffic particles. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine;179: 572–578.
  66. ↵
    1. Franco R,
    2. Schoneveld O,
    3. Georgakilas AG,
    4. et al
    . Oxidative stress, DNA methylation and carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 2008; 266: 6–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Valinluck V,
    2. Tsai HH,
    3. Rogstad DK,
    4. et al
    . Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: 4100–4108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Tarantini L,
    2. Bonzini M,
    3. Apostoli P,
    4. et al
    . Effects of particulate matter on genomic DNA methylation content and iNOS promoter methylation. Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117: 217–222.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Javierre BM,
    2. Fernandez AF,
    3. Richter J,
    4. et al
    . Changes in the pattern of DNA methylation associate with twin discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genome Res 2010; 20: 170–179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Islam KN,
    2. Mendelson CR
    . Glucocorticoid/glucocorticoid receptor inhibition of surfactant protein-A (SP-A) gene expression in lung type II cells is mediated by repressive changes in histone modification at the SP-A promoter. Mol Endocrinol 2008; 22: 585–596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Ito K,
    2. Ito M,
    3. Elliott WM,
    4. et al
    . Decreased histone deacetylase activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1967–1976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Li YF,
    2. Gilliland FD,
    3. Berhane K,
    4. et al
    . Effects of in utero and environmental tobacco smoke exposure on lung function in boys and girls with and without asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 2097–2104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Magnusson LL,
    2. Olesen AB,
    3. Wennborg H,
    4. et al
    . Wheezing, asthma, hayfever, and atopic eczema in childhood following exposure to tobacco smoke in fetal life. Clin Exp Allergy 2005; 35: 1550–1556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. R Raherison C,
    2. Pénard-Morand C,
    3. Moreau D,
    4. et al
    . In utero and childhood exposure to parental tobacco smoke, and allergies in schoolchildren. Respir Med 2007; 101: 107–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Breton CV,
    2. Byun HM,
    3. Wenten M,
    4. et al
    . Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure affects global and gene-specific DNA methylation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 180: 462–467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Piipari R,
    2. Jaakkola JJ,
    3. Jaakkola N,
    4. et al
    . Smoking and asthma in adults. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 734–739.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 4 Table of Contents
Breathe: 9 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Basic science: Epigenetic programming and the respiratory system
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Basic science: Epigenetic programming and the respiratory system
Andrew L. Durham, Ian M. Adcock
Breathe Jun 2013, 9 (4) 278-288; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.000413

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Basic science: Epigenetic programming and the respiratory system
Andrew L. Durham, Ian M. Adcock
Breathe Jun 2013, 9 (4) 278-288; DOI: 10.1183/20734735.000413
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • DNA methylation
    • DNA methylation plays a key role in lung development
    • DNA methylation is important for the immune response
    • DNA methylation plays a key role in lung cancer
    • DNA packaging
    • Histone modifications
    • Histone acetylation
    • Other histone modifications
    • Role of histone modifications in lung diseases
    • Non-coding RNAs
    • Environmental factors alter the epigenetic profile
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Genetics
  • Mechanisms of lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • A clinicians’ review of the respiratory microbiome
  • Improving the quality of tracheostomy care
  • e-Learning for the medical team
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About Breathe

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Intructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 1810-6838
Online ISSN: 2073-4735

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society