Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine if the presence of focal normal bone marrow fat signal within a tumor on magnetic resonance imaging excludes malignancy.

Materials and methods

One hundred eighty-four histologically proven tumors with available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis from 184 patients were collected and reviewed at two separate institutions. There were 111 malignant and 73 benign tumors. Two radiologists at each institution, blinded to the diagnosis, reviewed the MRIs independently and reported the presence or absence of normal marrow fat signal within the tumor based upon T1-weighted imaging without fat suppression and T2-weighted imaging with fat suppression and/or short inversion-time inversion recovery (STIR). Discrepancies were then reviewed in consensus to determine the presence or absence of focal normal marrow signal. For each institution, a Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the frequency of focal normal marrow fat signal in benign and malignant tumors. This comparison was performed for each reader, as well as for the consensus reading at each site. Positive and negative predictive values were also calculated for each reader, as well as the consensus reading at each site. Fisher’s exact test was also used to compare the frequency of intratumoral fat in benign and malignant lesions for the pooled sample. Bayes theorem was used to calculate the positive and negative predictive values for the pooled consensus data. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were constructed for the pooled estimates using a bootstrapping algorithm.

Results

There was good interobserver reliability of 95.3% and 96.7% at sites 1 and 2, respectively. There were three discrepancies (one malignant and two benign) at site 1 and four discrepancies (two malignant and two benign) at site 2. Reader consensus at site 1 identified normal marrow fat signal within 1 of 50 (2.0%) malignant and three of 14 (21.4%) benign tumors. Findings were statistically significant with a p value of 0.030. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) at site 1 was 81.7% and 75.0%, respectively. Reader consensus at site 2 identified normal marrow fat signal within three of 61 (4.9%) malignant and 14 of 59 (23.7%) benign tumors. Findings were statistically significant with a calculated p value of 0.004. The PPV and NPV at site 1 was 56.3% and 82.4%, respectively. For the pooled consensus, the frequency of intratumoral fat in benign lesions (17/73, 23.3%) is significantly greater than the frequency in malignant lesions (4/111, 3.6%), p < 0.001.

Conclusion

The presence of focal normal marrow signal within a tumor is highly suggestive of a benign tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daffner RH, Lupetin AR, Dash N, et al. MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. AJR 1986; 146: 353–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, et al. Classification and detection of bone marrow lesions with magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27 10: 529–545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinborn MM, Heuck AF, Tiling R, et al. Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23 1: 123–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, et al. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics 1991; 11: 219–232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erlemann R, Reiser MF, Peters PE, et al. Musculoskeletal neoplasms: static and dynamic Gs-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 767–773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bollow M, Knauf W, Korfel A, et al. Initial experience with dynamic MR imaging in evaluation of normal bone marrow versus malignant bone marrow infiltrations in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7 1: 241–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM, et al. In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. AJR 1997; 169 5: 1439–1447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi C, et al. Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral lesions. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 7: 1811–1818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, et al. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174 2: 495–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wismer GL, Rosen BR, Buxton R, et al. Chemical shift imaging of bone marrow: preliminary experience. AJR 1985; 145: 1031–1037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zajick DC, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, et al. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology 2005; 237: 590–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998; 207 2: 349–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park SW, Lee JH, Ehara S, et al. Single shot fast spin echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine: is it useful in differentiating malignant metastatic tumor infiltration from benign fracture edema? Clin Imaging 2004; 28: 102–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bohndorf K, Reiser M, Lochner B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of primary tumours and tumour-like lesions of bone. Skeletal Radiol 1986; 15 7: 511–517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths HJ, Galloway HR, Thompson RC, et al. The use of MRI in the diagnosis of benign and malignant bone and soft tissue tumours. Australas Radiol 1993; 37 1: 35–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stacy GS. An analysis of malignant bone tumors for the presence of internal fat-signal-intensity on magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36: 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramsey RG, Zacharias CE. MR imaging of the spine after radiation therapy: easily recognizable effects. AJR 1985; 144: 1131–1135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI, Knapp PH, et al. Effect of radiation therapy on the thoracic and lumbar bone marrow: evaluation with MR imaging. AJR 1991; 157: 87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalrup-Link HE, Henning T, Link TM. MR imaging of therapy-induced changes of bone marrow. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 743–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sundaram M, Khanna G, El-Khoury GY. T1-weighted MR imaging for distinguishing large osteolysis of Paget’s disease from sarcomatous degeneration. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30: 378–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. S. Simpfendorfer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simpfendorfer, C.S., Ilaslan, H., Davies, A.M. et al. Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton. Skeletal Radiol 37, 797–804 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0523-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0523-7

Keywords

Navigation