The diversity of critical care nursing education in Australian universities

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(06)80009-3Get rights and content

Abstract

A range of critical care nursing educational courses exist throughout Australia. These courses vary in level of award, integration of clinical and academic competence and desired educational outcomes; this variability potentially leads to confuson by stakeholders regarding educational and clinical outcomes. The study objective was to describe the range of critical care nursing courses in Australia. Following institutional ethics approval, all relevant higher education providers (n=18) were invited to complete a questionnaire about course structure, content and nomenclature. Information about desired professional and general graduate characteristics and clinical competency was also sought.

A total of 89% of providers (n=16) responded to the questionnaire. There was little consistency in course structure in regard to the proportion of each programme devoted to core, speciality or generic subjects. In general, graduate certificate courses concentrated on core aspects of critical care, graduate diploma courses provided similar amounts of critical care core and speciality content, while master's level courses concentrated on generic nursing issues. The majority of courses had employment requirements, although only a small proportion specified the minimum level of critical care unit required for clinical experience. The competency standards developed by the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN) were used by 83% of providers, albeit in an adapted form, to assess competency. However, only 60% of programmes used personnel with a combined clinical and educational role to assess such competence.

In conclusion, stakeholders should not assume consistency in educational and clinical outcomes from critical care nursing education programmes, despite similar nomenclature or level of programme. However, consistency in the framework for speciality nurse education has the potential to prove beneficial for all stakeholders.

References (6)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (22)

  • Emergency nursing students’ and nurse educators’ perception of care delivery: A comparison study of self-assessment ratings

    2018, International Emergency Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Students in this study were in their final subject of a one year graduate certificate specialising in emergency nursing. This level of the higher education sector provides students with the foundation for specialist practice through teaching of fundamental concepts [25]. The high student ratings of ‘supervised’ reported in this study may, therefore, represent the required skill level of a beginning specialist emergency nurse practitioner.

  • A two phase study to revise the Australian Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses

    2017, Australian Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    This study also confirmed that the standards were being used mainly for the purpose of assessment of clinical performance. In the context of postgraduate education, it had already been identified that the standards were being adapted to reflect the practice expectations for graduates of critical care education programs,16,17 and there has been recent work to clearly articulate these practice expectations.50,51 It will be interesting to follow how the graduate practice standards50,51 are used and how these might impact on the use of the Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses43 for the assessment of student clinical performance in critical care education programs.

  • Comparison of postgraduate student and educator appraisals: A retrospective analysis

    2017, Nurse Education in Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    All elements emphasise the need for critical thinking, synthesis of data, and knowledge of research methods and translation. The potentially low scores on these criteria reflect that these students were still at the beginning of their critical care careers and in only the first semester of their postgraduate certificate, the development of these critical thinking skills will continue over one's career (Aitken et al., 2006; Scholes and Endacott, 2003). It also flags the difficulty and importance of teaching these skills as opposed to emphasising of task based achievements and how critical thinking can be assessed in a valid and reliable manner.

  • Twenty-five years of critical care nursing scholarship in Australia

    2013, Australian Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    The first state to achieve full transfer was NSW in 1985, while other states phased the transfer from hospital to tertiary programs more gradually, with Queensland having its last entry to hospital-based programs in 1990.2 Following the transfer of undergraduate nursing education to the tertiary sector there was rapid growth in postgraduate nursing courses for specialty practice at the Certificate, Diploma and Masters levels,3–5 notably in clinical specialties but also in fields such as education and management. Students of Graduate Diploma programs often continued on to Masters of Nursing degrees, while other diplomates later returned to university to complete masters degrees.5

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text