Elsevier

Atherosclerosis

Volume 236, Issue 2, October 2014, Pages 338-350
Atherosclerosis

Review
The effects of coronary artery calcium screening on behavioral modification, risk perception, and medication adherence among asymptomatic adults: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score as a motivational tool in management of cardiovascular disease.

  • Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score enhances adherence to medication regimen.

  • Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score has the potential for beneficial behavioral and lifestyle modification.

  • Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can likely change beliefs and perceptions of risk for coronary artery disease.

Abstract

Objective

To perform systematic review of the effects of screening for coronary artery calcium (CAC), a subclinical marker of coronary artery disease (CAD), on behavioral or lifestyle modification, risk perception, and medication adherence.

Methods

We searched through CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials, and PubMed (Medline) for studies on the effects of CAC screening in asymptomatic individuals across three major domains: behavioral modification, risk perception for CAD, and medication adherence. We extracted data from the retrieved studies, assessed and synthesized the information.

Results

Of the 15 retrieved studies, three were randomized control trials and 12 were observational studies. CAC score was ascertained either as total score, quartiles, or standardized Agatston's ordinal scale. While all the 15 studies involved issues related to behavioral and medication adherence, four involved risk perception of CAD. Although no standardized approach was used in these studies, CAC screening enhanced medication adherence in 13 of the 15 studies, while the others were mixed.

Conclusion

CAC screening improved medication adherence and could likely motivated individuals for beneficial behavioral or lifestyle changes to improve CAD. The mixed results suggest the need for further research because screening for subclinical atherosclerosis has significant implications for early detection and prevention of future cardiovascular events by aggressive risk factors modification.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.), contributes to significant health and economic burden on individuals and societies [1]. In the U.S., CVD alone accounts for 1 in 3 deaths and total direct and indirect costs of more than $300 billion per year [1]. Coronary artery disease (CAD), the commonest form of CVD, accounts for 1 in 6 deaths in the U.S. [1]. Coronary atherosclerosis starts in a subclinical phase and slowly progress over years before the development of clinical cardiovascular events [2]. While 80% of the 180,000–250,000 sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in the U.S. are attributed to CAD [3], [4], 50% of all SCDs occurs in persons without prior overt diagnosed CAD [5]. Additionally, a significant number of patients that experience silent myocardial infarction (MI) remains asymptomatic, especially those with other comorbid conditions. Risk assessment tools such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and the European Heart Score based on established traditional CAD risk factors (age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and smoking) have been useful in determining the risk of CAD in asymptomatic adults [6], [7]. However, these tools explain 60–65% risk for CAD [8], [9], [10], thereby often underestimating the risk among patients with subclinical disease [11], [12]. This has given rise to the need for other screening methods or tools to assess the risk for CAD, especially in asymptomatic individuals.

Coronary artery calcium (CAC), detected by computed tomography (CT), is a subclinical marker of CAD that predicts the risk of CAD with high prognostic significance among asymptomatic individuals [13]. Assessment of CAC enables risk stratification diagnosis of CAD and directs the treatment and management of CAD among asymptomatic individuals. The amount of calcium deposits along the atherosclerotic coronaries arteries [26] in an individual helps estimate the severity of the risk for CAD [14], [15] and predicts future cardiac events, including MI and SCD [16]. Several studies have shown that CAC is an independent predictor of coronary events [17], [18], [19], and particularly useful in the reclassification of individuals at low or intermediate risks for CAD [19], [20] by traditional risk score assessment [21]. It has been reported that asymptomatic individuals with CAC ≥100 were 7–10 times more likely to have cardiac events than those with CAC score of zero [18], and those with CAC >1000 had 36% chance of MI or cardiac mortality within 28 months [22]. Additionally, studies have demonstrated a strong positive correlation between CAC and traditional risk factors [23], [24]. Thus, the presence of these risk factors increases the amount of calcium deposits in coronary arteries as indicated by high levels of CAC scores, thereby augmenting the risk of CAD. While the existing evidence supports the importance of CAC in predicting future cardiovascular events [1], [8], [13], an emerging area of interest is the effects of the knowledge about CAC score in motivation for beneficial behavioral change, risk perception, medication or treatment adherence, and positive health outcomes [25], [26], [27].

Reduction of CVD morbidity and mortality requires primary and secondary prevention through behavioral or lifestyle modification and control of risk factors, along with early detection through screening tools [25], [28]. CAC score is a screening tool that facilitates early detection of CAD and improves risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals [20], with the potential to improve treatment, management, and prevention strategies [29]. However, the effects of knowledge of CAC score in modifying an individual's behavior, risk perception of CAD, and adherence to treatment or medication for other comorbid conditions has not been adequately studied [30], [31]. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on CAC scores as a motivational tool for positive behavioral change, risk perception, and medication adherence. This review on the utility of CAC in CAD management and prevention is important because patient's compliance with established recommended guidelines for traditional risk factors reduction has been limited [32]. As such, this review will provide insight on the importance of CAC screening and scores, and has broader implication for clinical practice, behavioral interventions, policy development.

Section snippets

Literature search and selection

In December 2013 and March 2014, two librarians at the James H. Quillen College of Medicine at East Tennessee State University performed a comprehensive literature search in five databases, including CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials, and PubMed (Medline), using search terms ([“coronary artery calcium”] AND [“motivation” OR “lifestyle” OR “risk perception” OR “medication adherence”]) provided by the researchers (Fig. 1). All the retrieved

Characteristics of eligible CAC studies

Of the 1626 publications retrieved in the initial search, 15 met our eligibility criteria (Fig. 2). The first study to address the potential of CAC as a motivating tool in clinical practice was published in 1996 using a population from Torrance, California, USA [35]. This study found that while CAC score was significantly associated with increased odds of new aspirin usage, new cholesterol medication, consulting with physician, losing weight, decreasing dietary fat, it increased worry. As of

Discussion

Over 15.4 million adults in the U.S. have coronary heart disease (CHD) [1]. Since not all atherosclerosis evolve to hemodynamically significant CAD, it means million more adults have subclinical CAD and are at risk of future cardiac events. Although the association of traditional risk factors (e.g., dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension) and CAD has been established [7], [55], 1 in 5 Americans continue to smoke [56], 1 in 3 are overweight [57], less than half of adults aged 18 years

Conclusion

Studies suggest that cardiovascular events are preventable through risk factor modification efforts. Thus, by behavioral or lifestyle modification and subsequent reduction in CVD risk [76], [77], the leading cause of death in the U.S. [1] and worldwide, would be reduced. There is underutilization of CVD risk factors control medication, which makes the identification of subclinical markers such as CAC that facilitate medication adherence with overall reduction of CVD morbidity and mortality,

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

References (77)

  • M.S. Lauer

    Screening asymptomatic subjects for subclinical atherosclerosis: not so obvious

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2010 Jul 6)
  • A.R. Jadad et al.

    Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

    Control Clin Trials

    (1996 Feb)
  • N.D. Wong et al.

    Does coronary artery screening by electron beam computed tomography motivate potentially beneficial lifestyle behaviors?

    Am J Cardiol

    (1996 Dec 1)
  • A.J. Taylor et al.

    Community-based provision of statin and aspirin after the detection of coronary artery calcium within a community-based screening cohort

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2008 Apr 8)
  • J. Lederman et al.

    Information given to postmenopausal women on coronary computed tomography may influence cardiac risk reduction efforts

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2007 Apr)
  • J.A. Rumberger et al.

    Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1999 Mar)
  • A. Rozanski et al.

    Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2011 Apr 12)
  • N.K. Kalia et al.

    Visualizing coronary calcium is associated with improvements in adherence to statin therapy

    Atherosclerosis

    (2006 Apr)
  • R.H. Orakzai et al.

    Effect of patient visualization of coronary calcium by electron beam computed tomography on changes in beneficial lifestyle behaviors

    Am J Cardiol

    (2008 Apr 1)
  • S. Sharma et al.

    Adherence to the food guide pyramid recommendations among Japanese Americans, Native Hawaiians, and whites: results from the multiethnic cohort study

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2003 Sep)
  • S. Sharma et al.

    Adherence to the food guide pyramid recommendations among African Americans and Latinos: results from the Multiethnic Cohort

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2004 Dec)
  • S. Yusuf et al.

    Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study

    Lancet

    (2004 Sep 11–17)
  • S. Shareghi et al.

    Prognostic significance of zero coronary calcium scores on cardiac computed tomography

    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr

    (2007 Dec)
  • N. Lehmann et al.

    Effects of lifestyle modification on coronary artery calcium progression and prognostic factors in coronary patients–3-year results of the randomized SAFE-LIFE trial

    Atherosclerosis

    (2011 Dec)
  • L. Hansson et al.

    Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group

    Lancet

    (1998 Jun 13)
  • A.S. Go et al.

    Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (2013 Jan 1)
  • A.D. Hingorani et al.

    Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: time to get more or less personal?

    JAMA

    (2009 Nov 18)
  • A.S. Adabag et al.

    Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology and risk factors

    Nat Rev Cardiol

    (2010 Apr)
  • W.B. Kannel et al.

    Epidemiology of sudden death: insights from the Framingham Study

    Cardiovasc Clin

    (1985)
  • M.J. Budoff et al.

    Expert review on coronary calcium

    Vasc Health Risk Manag

    (2008)
  • O. Melander et al.

    Novel and conventional biomarkers for prediction of incident cardiovascular events in the community

    JAMA

    (2009 Jul 1)
  • J. Yeboah et al.

    Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals

    JAMA

    (2012 Aug 22)
  • P. Greenland et al.

    ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Circulation

    (2010 Dec 21)
  • American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents et al.

    ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2010 Jun 8)
  • J.A. Rumberger et al.

    Coronary calcium, as determined by electron beam computed tomography, and coronary disease on arteriogram. Effect of patient's sex on diagnosis

    Circulation

    (1995 Mar 1)
  • P. Greenland et al.

    ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)

    Circulation

    (2007 Jan 23)
  • P.W. Wilson et al.

    Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories

    Circulation

    (1998 May 12)
  • R. Detrano et al.

    Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups

    N Engl J Med

    (2008 Mar 27)
  • Cited by (93)

    • Relation of coronary calcium scoring with cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes: The CLARIFY Registry

      2022, Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
      Citation Excerpt :

      The negative predictive value of a CAC of zero in this patient population was high, suggesting that the absence of CAC in this patient population may be interpreted as a reassuring result, although limited by the relatively short follow-up duration. Studies with CAC scoring (without image depiction) in non-diabetes patient populations have reported that for individuals who were informed of positive CAC, higher scores were associated with a range of positive changes.31–35 The most common behaviors that changed included adherence to statin and aspirin therapy, improved diet, and increased exercise.36,37

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 423 979 4106; fax: +1 423 979 4134.

    2

    Tel.: +1 615 936 3531; fax: +1 615 343 6249.

    3

    Tel.: +1 310 222 4107; fax: +1 310 782 9652.

    View full text