Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 45, Supplement 2, August 2004, Pages S13-S19
Lung Cancer

Impact of low-dose CT on lung cancer screening

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.07.997Get rights and content

Summary

Despite advances in therapy, the prognosis of lung cancer remains dismal due to the fact that most cases of lung cancer are diagnosed at advanced stages, when the chance of cure is poor. In cases detected at early stages prognosis is better. Unfortunately, early lung cancer usually causes no symptoms and is, consequently, rarely diagnosed.

Therefore, screening for early asymptomatic lung cancer with diagnostic procedures appears promising particularly as risk factors for lung cancer are well known (cigarette smoking, occupational asbestos exposure and others) and screening could, therefore, focus on these risk groups.

In the past, screening trials using analysis of sputum cytology and to some extent chest radiography have failed to demonstrate a reduction in lung-cancer mortality with screening, probably due to insufficient sensitivity of these tests for early lung cancer. During the last decade the introduction of spiral computed tomography (CT) has provided a technique with a much higher sensitivity for small lung cancers.

Feasibility studies using low-radiation-dose CT demonstrated a high proportion of non-small-cell lung cancer at the initial examination (prevalence) with decreasing numbers of detected cancers at follow-up (incidence). The proportion of early-stage tumors was high both at prevalence and incidence examinations. The rate of invasive procedures for benign lesions was low; most indeterminate lesions could be classified with non-invasive diagnostic approaches. The proportion of interval cancers (cancers diagnosed by symptoms between two screening CT scans) was low. As, however, these one-arm feasibility trials are not appropriate to ass; a potential mortality reduction through CT screening, prospective randomised multicenter trials were recently initiated in several countries to analyse the effect of CT screening on lung-cancer mortality.

References (46)

  • ShyuC.L. et al.

    Fast-growing squamous cell lung cancer

    Lung Cancer

    (2002)
  • DiederichS.

    Screening for early lung cancer with Low-dose spiral computed tomography

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • American Cancer Society

    Cancer facts and figures

  • ShoplandD.R. et al.

    Smoking-attributable cancer mortality in 1991: is lung cancer now the leading cause of death among smokers in the United States?

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1991)
  • FontanaR.S. et al.

    Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic Study

    Am Rev Resp Dis

    (1984)
  • FrostJ.K. et al.

    Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study

    Am Rev Resp Dis

    (1984)
  • KubikA. et al.

    Lung cancer detection: results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia

    Cancer

    (1986)
  • EddyD.M.

    Screening for lung cancer

    Ann Int Med

    (1989)
  • AustinJ.H.M. et al.

    Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • GurneyJ.W.

    Missed lung cancer at CT: imaging findings in nine patients

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • CostelloP. et al.

    Pulmonary nodule: Evaluation with spiral volumetric CT

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • Remy-JardinM. et al.

    Pulmonary nodules: detection with thick-section spiral CT versus conventional CT

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • BuckleyJ.A. et al.

    Pulmonary nodules: Effect of increased data sampling on detection with spiral CT and confidence in diagnosis

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Management strategy of pulmonary nodule in 2013

      2013, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the 1990s, chest CT has been thought to be very promising for screening examinations as it has a ten-fold greater detection power than standard radiography for uncalcified nodules [48–50]. Published observational studies over the last decade [3,51–55] have shown that CT screening in an at-risk population diagnoses between 0.4 and 2.7% of people with cancers, mostly stage I. The effectiveness of screening, however, can only be demonstrated by showing a reduction in cancer-specific mortality which implies prospective randomized inclusion of a large number of patients.

    • Diagnostic value of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 tumor markers in primary lung cancer

      2013, Lung Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      The accurate diagnosis of lung cancer from benign lung disease is an important task. Recently, computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as an early detection screening tool [2–5]. Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer [4].

    • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

      2012, Clinical Radiation Oncology: Third Edition
    • Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

      2011, Clinical Radiation Oncology, Third Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text