ReviewSuccessful publishing: How to get your paper accepted
Section snippets
Respect
Clinical scientists are overwhelmed by 2 million biomedical papers published every year by almost 20,000 journals: reading 5500 new papers/day is certainly an impossible target. It is crucial to avoid wasting the reader's time.
For this reason the publication of meaningless or previously published data should not be attempted; this is different from conducting confirmatory studies and sharing such findings with the bio-medical community. It was previously stated that “You don't write because you
Ethical issues
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) published a document called Guidelines on Good Publication Practice [13] providing clarifications on study design, data analysis, authorship, conflicts of interest, peer review, redundant publication, plagiarism, duties of editors, media relations and advertising.
This is a must-read document for all those who are involved in any editorial activity. Similar suggestions have also been provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (ICMJE) [14], the
The layout
Since its origin in 1665, the structure of scientific papers has undergone substantial changes (Table 1) because the form and the style were not initially standardised: the letter and the experimental report coexisted. Letters were usually single authored, written in a polite style, and addressed several subjects at the same time. The experimental report was descriptive and the events were often presented in chronological order. Reporting experiments evolved to a more structured form in which
The English
Complying with the home style and strict regulations of the modern electronic submission may help authors to homogenise their submissions; this is intended to make the final issue more clear and pleasant to read. Electronic submission guidelines are to be religiously followed simply because the article will never reach any reviewer if not structured as requested.
Accurate editing is crucial: sloppy submissions with substandard layout, grammatical and punctuation errors, inaccurate referencing
Bring home messages
Write with your readership in mind—undergraduates, nurses, PhDs etc.
Imagine you have to pay for every single word you write: keep it short. Content comes first, lay out second: on special occasions, when the submission is exceptionally valuable, Elsevier may be available to amend the text and improve the final layout.
The process of conducting clinical/basic research can only be fully understood after experiencing the process of writing a scientific paper; oncologists are very good at that.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Sarah Jenkins, Publishing Editor, Elsevier Ltd., for her valuable comments and continuous support.
References (48)
The future of scientific publishing
Acta Histochem
(2008)- et al.
How to get your paper published
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2001) - et al.
The art of successful publication. ECCO 13 workshop report
Eur J Cancer
(2006) - et al.
Characteristics of meta-analyses related to acceptance for publication in a medical journal
J Clin Epidemiol
(2001) Wring a paper
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2007)- et al.
Statistical methods in the surgical literature
J Am Coll Surg
(2006) - et al.
Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity
J Clin Epidemiol
(2008) - et al.
Beyond style guides: suggestions for better scientific English
Acta Histochem
(2005) Writing for publication: the basics
Women Birth
(2008)- et al.
A clarity clinic for surgical writing
J Surg Res
(2008)