Chest
Volume 132, Issue 3, September 2007, Pages 852-859
Journal home page for Chest

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
SLEEP MEDICINE
Variations in Physician Interpretation of Overnight Pulse Oximetry Monitoring

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-0312Get rights and content

Background

Overnight pulse oximetry is commonly used for hypoxemia evaluation in patients with COPD and sleep-disordered breathing. There is little information regarding its impact on physician decision making, and therefore an important measure of its clinical utility is untested and unknown. The aim of this study was to describe physician interpretation, use, and opinions regarding overnight pulse oximetry.

Methods

Forty-one pulmonary physicians and fellows participated in structured interviews consisting of three oximetry record interpretations, oral responses to a standard question set, and a questionnaire. Qualitative data were analyzed using an open coding process. Quantitative data were assessed for distributions.

Results

Four measures were consistently used by the majority of physicians in record interpretation: background information, arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) waveform and pattern, and time spent with Spo2 < 90%. An additional 10 measures were consistently used by 5 to 46% of physicians. No interpretation generated a recommendation with > 60% consensus. There was a wide range of opinions on important matters related to this test, including test utility, indications, variables considered most important for interpretation, and criteria for nocturnal oxygen prescription. Forty-one physicians provided 35 different opinions on when nocturnal supplemental oxygen should be initiated.

Conclusions

The variation in physician interpretation, use, and opinions regarding overnight pulse oximetry calls into question its clinical utility and underscores a need for standardization of presentation, training, and interpretation.

Section snippets

Participants

A total of 24 board-certified pulmonary physicians and 17 pulmonary fellows in three academic medical centers in Cleveland participated in the study. The division chief from each participating institution granted permission to approach their physicians for enrollment into this study. Requests were made to keep the subject matter of the interview confidential to avoid priming subsequent subjects. Interviews were conducted in physician offices or at a conveniently located conference room. The

Results

A total of 24 board-certified pulmonary physicians and 17 pulmonary and critical care fellows participated in the study. This represented 65% of all potential subjects in the three academic centers. Reasons for not participating included the following: co-author, busy schedule, failure to return contact, and absence (eg, vacation). All participants completed the interview process.

Discussion

We found a wide variation in physician interpretation and use of overnight pulse oximetry. When presented with three separate oximetry records, physicians weighed different information and generated substantially different recommendations. They also had varying opinions regarding test indications, test utility, the “most important” information, and criteria for nocturnal supplemental oxygen prescription.

These findings have important implications for the clinical utility of overnight oximetry.

References (20)

  • CA Lewis et al.

    Home overnight pulse oximetry in patients with COPD: more than one recording may be needed

    Chest

    (2003)
  • A Chaouat et al.

    A randomized trial of nocturnal oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

    Eur Respir J

    (1999)
  • WA Whitelaw et al.

    Clinical usefulness of home oximetry compared with polysomnography for assessment of sleep apnea

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2005)
  • N Netzer et al.

    Overnight pulse oximetry for sleep-disordered breathing in adults: a review

    Chest

    (2001)
  • E Chiner et al.

    Nocturnal oximetry for the diagnosis of the sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome: a method to reduce the number of polysomnographies?

    Thorax

    (1999)
  • DG Fryback et al.

    The efficacy of diagnostic imaging

    Med Decis Making

    (1991)
  • DG Davila et al.

    Oximeter's acquisition parameter influences the profile of respiratory disturbances

    Sleep

    (2003)
  • VG Kirk et al.

    Comparison of home oximetry monitoring with laboratory polysomnography in children

    Chest

    (2003)
  • UJ Magalang et al.

    Prediction of the apnea-hypopnea index from overnight pulse oximetry

    Chest

    (2003)
  • JC Vazquez et al.

    Automated analysis of digital oximetry in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea

    Thorax

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (36)

  • Polysomnography

    2023, Encyclopedia of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
  • WRISTOX<inf>2</inf> is a reliable tool to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

    2021, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Use of pulse oximetry at home has not shown a similar success as when done in hospital [19], hence these results will likely differ if the WristOx2 is used at home. The pulse oximetry monitoring is scored manually by a doctor and therefore the result is operator dependent and may lack consistency, especially if not trained properly [23] although the interobserver variability in this study was low. Pulse oximetry measures the oxygen saturation change and does not monitor nasal flow and respiratory effort as per polysomnography, thus it is not able to distinguish obstructive events from central events and hence, may give inaccurate results in children with mixed sleep-disordered breathing.

  • Polysomnography

    2013, Encyclopedia of Sleep
  • Polysomnography

    2013, Encyclopedia of Sleep
  • Sleep medicine training across the spectrum

    2011, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    We take for granted that clinical assessment and testing are rational and lead to optimal outcome, when in reality there is variance in each area.57 One example found in pulmonary medicine is the difference in physician interpretation in oximetry over time, where it appears that there are no standards.58 Are there such standards across laboratories or within each center?

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding was provided by the American Heart Association National Scientist Development Award (0530188N), CHEST Foundation of the American College of Chest Physicians T. Franklin Williams Geriatric Development Research Award, and National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant K23 HL079114–01A2.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

View full text