The importance of clinical suspicion in diagnosing pulmonary embolism: a case of false-positive high probability radionuclide perfusion lung scan

Eur J Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;11(4):234-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mej.0000134839.34865.1f.

Abstract

The accuracy of scintigraphic evidence of perfusion defects, even when classified as 'high probability' by matching with ventilation techniques or thoracic roentenograms is unsatisfactory when used without a pre-test clinical evaluation of probability. Although unusual, a complete or near-complete unilateral absence of perfusion in a lung with normal perfusion controlaterally must alert clinicians to the possibility of a false-positive result. In such instances, the administration of therapeutic dosages of fibrinolitic and antithrombotic agents (or even surgery) may lead to deleterious consequences. We report a patient with malignancy causing extrinsic narrowing of the pulmonary artery leading to a drastic impairment in the perfusion of an entire lung, compatible with, but not diagnostic of massive pulmonary embolism.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Constriction, Pathologic / diagnostic imaging
  • Contrast Media
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / complications
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Perfusion*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnostic imaging*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / etiology
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Substances

  • Contrast Media